help hurry due tommorow civics and economics please some one!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????????

Question

answer in a complete sentence
1.what is a synonym for expressed powers?
2.what is the difference between expressed and implied powers?
3.what could be a problem with interpreting the implied powers of the US constitution?(interpreting means explain the meaning of)
4.what are the houses of the va general assembly?
5.what are the houses of the us congress?
6.what is judicial review?
7.who was john marshall and why is marbury vs. madison important?
8.what could be the danger of the supreme court having the power of judicial review?(hint: remember there only 9 justices on the supreme court!)

9.read the 5th amendment quote and write in your own words.
"no person.....shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor deprived of life liberty, or property without due process of the law:\;..."

10.read the 14th amendment quote and write it in your own words.
"....no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the united states,...."

Answer 1

i think you waited too long.

Answer 2

1 Clear, Definite, Explict, Plain.

2. Expressed powers are those power that are plainly defined. Implied powers are the powers that are gathered by implication or necessary deduction from the circumstances.

3.The problem with interpreting the implied power of the US Constitution is simply the possibility of granting powers to the government that are not spicificilly intended in the Constitution.

4. House of Delegates and Senate

5.House of Representitives and Senate

6. A Judicial review are the powers deligated to the courts to review decisions of another government entity or court.

7. John Marshall was the 4th Cheif Justice of the US Supreme Court and under his guidance made the Supreme Court the center of government. ----- Maybury v. madison provided the basis for the Supreme Court to review the federal statues passed by the Congress under artical 3 of the US Constitution.

8. The Supreme Court can rule by verdict recending the laws passed by the President and Congress. The Supreme Court is not elected but appointed and under extreem circumstances cannot be removed from the bench. The jurist on the S. C. basiclly answers to no one.

9. Basiclly you cannot be forced by threat, corceion, or torture to testify against yourself. Nor can you be impressioned, executed or fined without first the evidence properly presented against you and your ability to present evidence in your defence.

10. The 14th Amendment basically states no state within the United Statse may pass a law or enforced a law which will remove your privileges or protections as granted to all citizens of the United States.

Next time do your own homework.

Answer 3

1. A Law.
2. The part that says "Any power not expressly reserved to the federal govt shall belong to the states alone." i.e...expressed is a law detailing the power being reserved. Implied is one in which is not stated exactly. Such as Judicial Review.
3. The supreme court does it all the time (i.e. abortion).
4. House and Senate
5. House and Senate
6. The right of the courts to interpret the laws passed by Congress.
7. He was the Chief Justice who first brought out the idea that the Supreme Court was the ultimate interpreter of the law. There is nowhere in the Constitution that defines the supreme court as having that power. Its now assumed to be the case, but is not stated (i.e....Implied Power......!)
8. A totally packed court can reverse all previous rulings (i.e, amendments, etc)
9. You cannot be forced to admit anything and coercison is forbeidden (torture). You have the right to a trial for any criminal accusation.
10.The Federal government reserves the right to invalidate any state law it does not like..

Answer 4

Basically, Jefferson and Madison who had difficulty understanding the principles of banking, charged that Hamilton's creation of a bank was unconstitutional. So, Hamilton responded: and Washington and the Supreme Court sided with Hamilton!

Keep in mind, Hamilton created the executive to trump the other branches if need be:

THE President of the United States is to be "commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States." The propriety of this provision is so evident in itself, and it is, at the same time, so consonant to the precedents of the State constitutions in general, that little need be said to explain or enforce it. Even those of them which have, in other respects, coupled the chief magistrate with a council, have for the most part concentrated the military authority in him alone. Of all the cares or concerns of government, the direction of war most peculiarly demands those qualities which distinguish the exercise of power by a single hand. The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength, forms a usual and essential part in the definition of the executive authority.

"The President may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective officers." This I consider as a mere redundancy in the plan, as the right for which it provides would result of itself from the office.


It is conceded, that implied powers are to be considered as delegated equally with express ones.

Alexander was the first to introduce and understood it best, so read read read Alexander Hamilton.


10. It leaves therefore a criterion of what is constitutional, and of what is not so. This criterion is the end, to which the measure relates as a mean. If the end be clearly comprehended within any of the specified powers, and if the measure have an obvious relation to that end, and is not forbidden by any particular provision of the constitution--it may safely be deemed to come within the compass of the national authority. There is also this further criterion which may materially assist the decision: Does the proposed measure abridge a pre-existing right of any State, or of any individual? If it does not, there is a strong presumption in favour of its constitutionality; and slighter relations to any declared object of the constitution may be permitted to turn the scale.

Answer 5

Taken from a "New Century Handbook 3rd ed.". Both the plowman and the ox have worked "in vain," the corn has "rotted," and the "crows are fatted with the murrion flock" (A Midsummer Night's Dream 2.1.93-97). If you are using footnotes or end notes place the number of the quote at the end, inside the parenthesis with the period on the outside. If you are using word it will do it for you. There are many different ways to cite depending upon what style of writing you are using. The above, MLA, is the most used in academic circles not including the sciences. Hope this helps.

Answer 6

Should have thought about this before Sunday night.Since people are giving you the answers,are you going to put their name on the assignment since it isn't your work?

Answer 7

Hello Jay, I'd like to introduce you to my friends Google, Wikipedia and Jeeves.

Answer 8

If you have this much time to be writing this you have enough time to do your report!

If you're that lazy please don't do the following:

1. Vote
2. Run for elected office

Answer 9

What are you doing on here instead of on your work? We went thru school and did our time!

Answer 10

you've just learned a valuable lesson about doing your own homework. I hope you've learned something.

Answer 11

dude, i just had civics last semester, its easy, what were you doing instead of paying attetnion?