And still does, yet lies about it...Guess I don't blame her, look what the Dems did to Lieberman for being honest..
2007-01-28 10:14:02 · 15 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She needs new dance lessons I think
2007-01-28 10:21:12 · update #1
Some Hillary quotes for those who are confused on this issue:
"Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price."
Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
September 13, 2001
http://www.wavsource.com/news/20010911a.htm
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
Here's a few of the MANY US Senators who voted YES to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq and US Senators who voted YES to the "PATRIOT ACT" - October 25, 2001:
Clinton, Hillary (D-NY)
Edwards, John (D-NC)
Kerry, John (D-MA)
Reid, Harry (D-NV)
Lieberman, Joseph (D-CT)
For complete list, see: http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
2007-01-28 10:38:00 · answer #1 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Trust me, this will come up in the Democratic primary and Obama will have a field day with this. Remember that Obama never voted for military action in Iraq (he was not elected to the Senate until 2004), Clinton did. This will not look good for Senator Clinton as she tries to get her party's nomination. Clinton is at least dealing with this issue head-on now rather than six or eight months from now. Politically, this may be a non-issue in six to eight months.
2007-01-28 18:20:41 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think she is a joke. She will do and say ANYTHING to grab and hold onto POWER.
She is now calling for the US to pull out of Iraq by 2009. I'm so glad she has a plan that she shared with the terrorists!
2007-01-28 19:07:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good Question.
Instead of just standing up for what she does, like Bush, she tap dances.
Typical Democrat Posture: Tap Dance.
(She supports the War.....BUT she could do it a lot better than anyone else.)
2007-01-28 18:22:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She has been taking lessons from J. Kerry on how to flip- flop.
2007-01-28 19:17:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes very amusing watching her filp flop just because she is running for president. Her voting record speaks for itself and she voted for the war.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237
2007-01-28 19:00:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She admitted her mistake, where were you, then? Or are you just another one of those people who hangs on to the past, without any regard for the future/.
2007-01-28 19:58:36 · answer #7 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I find it hilarious. She would probably give her arm to take back that vote. Just goes to show that she has no strength in her convictions.
2007-01-28 18:21:06 · answer #8 · answered by Jenny A_331 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
She needs to go on a date with Chavez.
2007-01-28 18:23:33 · answer #9 · answered by Lynn G 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not true. Check your facts. She has been opposed for a very long time - despite her authorization vote - based on bogus intel provided by Bush.
2007-01-28 18:19:35 · answer #10 · answered by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋