If you learned that the next terrorist attack would be so horrendous that the U.S. would never recover,---?

Question

Would you , now, support George Bush, or would you support those who want to:
Repair our image overseas,---those who want to protect our civil rights,---those who want to bring our troops home now,-- or those who want to end ethnic profiling?

Would you vote for Liberal candidates?

Answer 1

We must put the survival of our family, and our country ahead of any other considerations.
Until somebody comes up with more than just hate-filled criticism of the President, we must stick with Bush.

Answer 2

Repairing our image overseas may help to prevent a terrorist attack.
If we fail to protect our civil rights, we may as well have died.
Our troops are stirring up even more hatred in the Middle East and Iraq, how is keeping them there protecting us from a terrorist attack?
Ethnic profiling doesn't work.

Answer 3

And if you learned the attack plan was for terrorists to melt the ice caps to flood the coasts, would you fight global warming? If you learned the attack plan was to drag the US into a war that would make it look like a loser, not a superpower, could you avoid the urge to attack? (See Osama Bin Laden's 2004 video, and look how Iran practically dares us to "make his day" waving a nuclear program in our face.) Because no terrorist group, nothing other than (MAYBE) a major nuclear power, can damage the US beyond repair in a direct attack. Terrorists can't take over the US, and can't survive as an army in Iraq, much less on US soil.

Answer 4

Would trying to repair our image actually stop those who wish to attack us or is the hatred of those who wish to attack is far too deep? Voting liberal candidates, trying to repair our image overseas, and bringing our troops home today would do absolutely NOTHING to prevent such an attack. You would agree that there are those out there that hate the United States so much that nothing we can do will ever eliminate that hatred.

Answer 5

Repair our image overseas,---those who want to protect our civil rights,---those who want to bring our troops home now,-- and those who want to end ethnic profiling

Answer 6

You are lot more likely to die from being in a car wreck, getting cancer, being killed by your boyfriend. I don't think that this war has stabilized the region at all. Sadaam was the wrong guy and Iraq was the wrong country to attack...Sadaam ran a secular government and is why Osama and him didn't get a long...he didn't bow to Sharia law which caters to the extremists. Yes, I'm upset about it, and you should be too.

Answer 7

Speculation. Since there is in fact no evidence, and each passing day makes it less and less likely, where does that leave you?

If we do speculate, and there was an attack as you say, I would still not support Bush, simply because he has not protected us here at home to the best of his ability. Un-inspected containers, open borders with little surveillance, thousands of miles of coastlines with little or no surveillance, etc...

Instead - well, never mind - you get the idea.

Answer 8

Well that all depends on whether or not Bush starts WW3 (due to his complete ignorance of Foreign Policy) before the terrorist can attack the US again.

Answer 9

I would support bush if I had any reason to believe supporting bush would be the best thing to reduce terrorism

Answer 10

bring our troops home,,,asap,its not the end of the world yet .repair our image overseas and here at home... then if such madness happens,,,well worst case is die with honor...dismissed.....