English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think yes.

2007-01-28 10:06:40 · 20 answers · asked by Kieran 2 in Politics & Government Elections

hahaha ken that was funny.

2007-01-28 10:10:52 · update #1

Someone give Sewer Gas a thumbs down for me. I dont have enough points.

2007-01-28 10:19:56 · update #2

20 answers

Yes he would. He'd take no nonsense from the USA or the EU.

2007-01-28 10:15:43 · answer #1 · answered by mini metro 6 · 7 4

Taz C - you needless to say have purely sheepishly relayed what you have examine interior the clicking. the clicking have an schedule. The credit crunch began interior the u . s .. with the aid of fact the united kingdom financial equipment is surely financial, then we are probable to be maximum effected in comparison to different, production worldwide places. The poisonous sources went from the yank banks to the British ones. None of it incredibly is Gordon brown's fault. He became the only between the stepped forward international locations that attempted to alter the financial equipment so as that it had extra assessments and balances. Britain in spite of the reality that that's dealing with a greater national debt, has drastically decrease debt than different stepped forward international locations consisting of Germany, France and the u . s .. Brown is definitely the extra appropriate guy. he's rather extra clever. Brown got here from a unfavorable historical past - his father became a Presbyterian minister. So that's in his nature to help others. Blair on the different hand got here from an extremely posh historical past and went to an extremely posh college. He became Bush's poodle. After workplace he landed an extremely worthwhile pastime for a financial company earning him £a million,000,000 a year. He additionally earns many extra tens of millions giving speeches. So Blair did no longer care approximately Britain - he became in it for the repute, the vast distinction and himself. Brown has led the international in attempting to extricate ourselves from the financial downturn. he is going to improve the utmost tax band on the utmost earners (a hundred and fifty,000 a year plus) to 40 5%. right here we can see the kind between the two men. while Blair became New Labour, Brown is classic Labour. In different phrases, Brown's substantial situation is the backside earners. Blair's situation became spinning each little thing to stay in workplace - all of the on an identical time as assisting no person. Brown is dedicated to increasing pastime expenditure. he's dedicated to tackling weight problems. he's dedicated to new styles of renewable power. Like I pronounced - he's so lots extra clever than maximum politicians. in short, he's for the folk, and would not pander to vast company agencies like Blair might. Blair became all spin and no substance. He led us right into a high priced, immoral conflict in Iraq and he has the audacity to declare himself a catholic. I in no way thought maximum of the Roman Catholic church, now i think of even much less of it.

2016-11-01 13:03:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I totally agree with Jayfire as regards to John Smith, I was gutted when he died, he was like OB1-KEN-OB, he was our only hope.

The only person I have any faith in now is John Reid, you know, the man who is being blamed for the mistakes of his predecessors. Had it not have been for his outspoken attitude, the home office would be swept under the carpet with all the other problems that, it would seem, no political party is dealing with to great effect.

I feel John Reid is being targeted so as not to be popular. Gordon Brown and George Galloway simply ooze corruption. If either get in I shall have to vote for the other side, something I swore I would never do after the reign of Thatcher.

2007-01-28 10:28:24 · answer #3 · answered by Spoonraker 3 · 0 3

I think no. The media have made scapegoats of Blair and Brown. Galloway is a relative novice and if elected would spend the G8 summit in the BB house =p

Remember the economy has grown...

2007-01-28 10:10:33 · answer #4 · answered by SS4 7 · 1 3

My grand mother would be a better PM than Blair, and she has been dead for the last 5 years.

2007-01-29 02:25:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No the mans far to liberal. and liberals today make laws saying how you should think. Disagree and your accussed of some( ism)or other. but the other two are just as bad. Probley the best man to lead the country at the moment would be Ken Clark

2007-01-28 15:03:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

George Galloway should be pilloried, drawn and quartered, then hung from Tower Bridge as an example.



British Member of Parliament
Told Saddam Hussein, "Sir, I salute your courage, your strength and your indefatigability"
"[T]he progressive movement around the world and the Muslims have the same enemies. Their enemies are the Zionist occupation, American occupation, British occupation of poor countries, mainly Muslim countries. They have the same interest in opposing savage capitalist globalization . . . the progressive organizations and movements agree on that with the Muslims. . . . So on the very grave big issues of the day - issues of war, occupation, justice, opposition to globalization - the Muslims and the progressives are on the same side."
Believed to be a recipient of payments stolen from the U.N. Oil-For-Food Program
Believed to have illegally used money from a charity which he founded
"I will not condemn the just war of populations of occupied territories when they resist, in any way that they can, uninvited invaders on to their sovereign soil."


British Member of Parliament George Galloway ranks among the most impassioned advocates of the de facto alliance that has been forged between Western leftists and radical Islamists, unlikely allies who have joined their efforts to oppose America's defensive War on Terror and its war of liberation in Iraq. This alliance is founded upon the leftists' and the Islamists' shared hatred for America.

2007-01-28 10:15:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

Come on, Kieran...he's the Brian Clough of politics - they know he's a stormer, and can run rings around the egotists - but they would never trust him on the stage...
...but must add - does he sometimes knows what he wants?

2007-01-28 10:24:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

of all the folk illegible and you have to name Mr Galloway i think your winding us up

2007-01-29 03:35:33 · answer #9 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 1 0

What's the weather like on your planet?

2007-01-28 10:28:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If he does become PM then who will take his place as Rula Lenska's cat?

2007-01-28 10:47:15 · answer #11 · answered by mickyrisk 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers