As a spoiled consumer nation,are you prepared to pay more in order to cover raised wages coming soon?

Question

We are going to have to do just that and it is only fair or small businesses are going to go out of business very quickly and are already discussing the ramifications.

People are due living wages and I feel sorry for the small business owners who have to shell out medical insurance,etc. We farmers never had anyone pay for ours or into a retirement plan and some times our livestock and grain sold for less than it caused to raise but you,the public,could not have cared less-and for sure the market price didn't go down to reflect that-the middle man makes the haul.I know it is hard on a low and fixed budget if prices go up but people being paid so little just cannot get by so suck it up and make cuts where you can (i.e. cigarettes, booze, foods that are making us sick,i.e. sweets,) and if you don't buy those things-good for you.

Answer 1

There will always be a salary disparity, so we need to manipulate the economy somewhat to assure that there is not a humanitarian crisis at the lowest end of the economic scale.

Presently, our economy is expanding, most are making acceptable wages and we are not in recession.

So, it only seems fair that we help the people who serve at the lower levels of the economic workplace.

I believe that the farmer has been subsidized throughout history, so, in general, you reaped the benefits of a compassionate nation.

I agree that the small farmer is usually the one who takes the greatest hit in slow economic times. However, one must adapt to a changing market. If farming doesn't result in an acceptable wage for your family, you must seek remuneration in other fields.

Instead of decrying the support the government provides to the neediest, try to concentrate on how you as an individual can be a productive member of society who contributes, even minimally, to the overall good of the nation.

Answer 2

No, you will maximum possibly get the comparable strengthen in spite of what happens to the minimum salary.... while they communicate of wealth redistribution, they do no longer seem to be conversing approximately taking some thing from the ten.00/hr adult males and giving it to the minimum wagers. The minimum salary improve is to mirror an improve interior the fee to stay in this u . s . a . on one-earnings. Your strengthen has no longer something to do with the minimum salary improve. Your 3% strengthen subjects are fullyyt mutually with your boss. how many minimum salary workers artwork at your employer, how many ordinary workers and what's the excellent volume paid for exertions? Take it up mutually with your boss, he's the guy who's offering you with a three% strengthen. no longer the government, no longer democrats and not the folk working under yu. 'moonbat' you haven't any longer have been given a clue approximately economics.....a fifteen% strengthen for the backside salary earners of a employer in authentic money is below 3-4%.....in the event that they strengthen expenses via 3-4%, all of those minimum wagers can now via greater, and those above this salary will nevertheless be waiting to locate the money for it..... examine a e book.