Vote for who you think will get the credit for Bush's plan:
1) The Pentagon (who came up with it)
2) The Iraq Study Group (who wanted us to cut and run)
3) Democrats (who have been saying add more troops all along)
4) McCain (who called it Bush's plan and supported it)
5) Bush, who is actually using the same plan he used in Fellujah
or, choose from these fine options:
6) Democrats (who think our troops are a bunch of failures anyway)
7) Democrats (who think our service members can do their jobs better from Okinawa)
8) Democrats (who went into the service after failing college)
9) Liberals (who think Saddam's genocides aren't big enough, we should have gone to the Sudan and Darfur instead)
10) Liberals (who think Bush is an idiot and can't win, even if he does)
11) Republican cowards (who are, as we speak, voting against our troops)
2007-01-28 08:24:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Nice answer, Tink. I wish I had thought of that!
2007-01-28 08:38:04 · update #1
Poor Mel actually thinks it's better for the world to have a MUSLIM style government in charge of all that oil! Let's hear it for Mel, folks, why have just one Iran when you can have two! What a plan!
2007-01-28 08:39:25 · update #2
Mel, in case you didn't notice, Fellujah's plan was a stunning success. Not only did we tame the most violent area of the country, Iraqi troops are not patrolling without our help. That's the plan, and it's the same plan we've had all along, secure the country and hand it off a little at a time.
2007-01-28 08:47:20 · update #3
(sorry about that, they are "now" patrolling without our help...)
2007-01-28 08:48:08 · update #4
Hey, Planksheer: guess what? The Iraqi army entered Baghdad without us and has already begun taking up positions. It looks like it's already working!
2007-01-28 08:57:08 · update #5
It will be none of the above - Hilary Clinton will take credit for it and say she takes back not supporting the Plan that if "she knew now what she did then", when its all over, it would have been her idea to begin with.
2007-01-28 08:28:08 · answer #1 · answered by Tink 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
i'm getting very uninterested in Bush's third term. I had was hoping Obama might overturn the Bush spending schedule, yet he basically made it worse. i became excited while Obama have been given elected, yet now i'm no longer. that's obvious that he will spend two times as much as Bush did in 0.5 the time. What a tragic day... in case you spent a million money an afternoon, on a daily basis, with the aid of fact the beginning of Jesus, you will possibly nonetheless no longer have spent as lots money as this one stimulus spending bill.
2016-11-01 12:54:29 · answer #2 · answered by bason 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush will go down in history as a ruthless President who favoured the destruction of three countries for the sake of avenging 9/11, without ever bringing any real justice, compensation and/or security to the people involved.
The "Global War on Terror" means slamming the military-industrial complex, Westernization, globalization, colonialism, anti-Arab sentiment and bloodthirst for oil up against Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism, with the people of these undemocratic countries stuck in the middle. That is why there is so much loss of life in Iraq and Afghanistan. The war in Somalia is paranoid and pointless, as it is highly unlikely that there is any terrorist recruiting camp down there.
2007-01-28 18:00:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
1 or Everyone. You. The Voter, because the plan was redone by the Pentagon after Republicans needed a reply to the Democratic win. (not so much their plans)
2007-01-28 08:40:48 · answer #4 · answered by Eric 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If Bush's plan works? works doing what? Making Iraq a western style country with the Kurd, Shite & Sunni living in love and harmony with no radical Muslim influence and cheap oil flowing from their fields into our refineries? Is that what Bush is trying to accomplish in Iraq?
Please, what is his plan? Just sending in more troops into that meat grinder?
2007-01-28 08:33:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
He should, he is taking all the heat for the libs saying it won't work. I pray to god we are successful so we can see all the Dems trying to take credit for what they did to make this war a success
2007-01-28 08:28:41 · answer #6 · answered by tbird 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nobody, is to late to fix it, just withdraw, impeach that monkey and try to restart the USA without the biggest Mafia ever.
2007-01-28 08:37:08 · answer #7 · answered by Sudamérica Puede 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
MMMMmm....I think #10...Like Ted (the swimmer) Kennedy,he will just go back to being FOR the war...after all,he has flip-flopped so many times nobody can keep track anyway !!
2007-01-28 08:32:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
was a bigass battle in Najaf today... 250 bad guys wasted
2007-01-28 08:30:32 · answer #9 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't fret; it won't happen.
2007-01-28 08:52:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋