verbal protests, then doing nothing is how we ended up in iraq in the first place. dems better grow a spine soon.
2007-01-28 08:02:38 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A spine on a democrat???, maybe if they had the spine to take the DNC back from George Sorros, mikie Moore, and Move.com eh.
2007-01-28 08:14:27 · answer #1 · answered by SockPuppets 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your question truly shows you don't know how funding the military works, the powers of the Commander in Chief ( W ) , and the lies told by the President ( unfortunately W again ) that started the war. As for growing a spine, what the hell are you talking about? And for the record , have you done anything to try and stop the war? You know, writing letters, emails, demonstrations, voting - or are you just another sheeple repub blowing smoke out of your butt?
2007-01-28 08:10:23 · answer #2 · answered by commonsense 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Congress’ approval score might flow up. The Democrats don’t have adequate votes to override Bush’s vetoes yet they have the ability to refuse to bypass from now on investment for the conflict. the yank people prefer the conflict ended. The Democrats have tried being lifelike and cooperative besides the shown fact that it doesn’t artwork. they are on checklist as having tried. in the event that they are able to’t get previous the obstructionist Republicans and Bush’s vetoes then they could take a extra complicated line attitude. the prevalent public will approve. The Democrats additionally could be arranged to effectively counter the Bush propaganda which will stick to the reducing of investment.
2016-11-01 12:51:16 · answer #3 · answered by bason 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not too swift are you? Liberals can be truly against the war without cutting funding to the troops. Try again.
2007-01-28 08:28:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the dems are against the war, but not the soldiers who fight in it.
it seems to me that it's a stunningly calous thing for the bush administration to literally hide behind our brave troops, basically daring the dems to cut funding.
i just don't understand how the radical conservatives have managed to be portrayed as somehow for the troops, when they so obviously are NOT.
2007-01-28 08:09:57 · answer #5 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree,Dem,s need to step to the plate.cut funding i feel will not work right now,,after all the lies and damaged bush did,,,just impeach bush so America can restore its global image.but Dem,s are they strong enough for such,,,looks like its still a flip on that,,,but if Iran goes the way bush wants it to,,,UP IN SMOKE,,,i feel that will open the eyes of everyone...cheers civilian
2007-01-28 08:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh now there's an intelligent idea. Nothing like supporting our troops by cutting back on bullets, mediacal care, food, supplies, upkeeps, and all the rest! It could only be a Demo's idea!
2007-01-28 08:09:19 · answer #7 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Agreed. No more Mr Nice Guy. We've been playing that too long and look how the Cons treat it. Time to kick butt.
2007-01-28 08:09:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because cutting funding will only hurt those troops out there not those who support the war back home
2007-01-28 08:07:27 · answer #9 · answered by Adam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL, because they did that in Vietnam. They have had 30 years to reflect on that ill-advised course of action.
2007-01-28 08:21:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋