2007-01-28 07:45:58 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Economics
The Supreme Court is simply part of the evolution of the American form of government from the paternal (maternal?) British style.
The separation of the purely practical legislative duties of the ruling body into a Congress, and the more abstract task of defining and interpreting law into a Supreme Court is one of the things that has allowed the American government to flourish.
Won't it be interesting to see what the next culture that rises out of (and hopefully not from the ashes of) the American culture learns from our example?
2007-02-02 04:43:14 · answer #1 · answered by piperjoe68 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Checks and balances are required for democratic countries.Parliament eventhough is supreme the laws passed by it are under the scrutiny of the Supreme Court.It has the power to interpret the constitution and review the laws made by the parliament through judicial review.It is good that they are not at loggerheads!
2007-02-03 21:33:41 · answer #2 · answered by cupid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
president ,parliament and supreme court are the supreme authority as per indian constitution and it had separate rights
2007-01-28 11:30:38 · answer #3 · answered by keral 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
parliament alone can amend the constitution
judiciary can only enforce the laws in in
2007-01-28 21:12:36 · answer #4 · answered by sushobhan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
General public suffers
2007-02-05 01:00:45 · answer #5 · answered by manoz kakkar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep them saperate. way to Appointment of judges must be changed and or done by another friendly countrys government!
2007-02-02 10:31:10 · answer #6 · answered by secret society 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
these are the two pillars of democracy for checks and balances in the society.
2007-01-30 05:29:16 · answer #7 · answered by Chandra 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋