2007-01-28 06:59:26 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
Last in first out
2007-01-28 07:04:58 · answer #1 · answered by man with the golden gun 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hiya - They used to use a simple method called LIFO (Last in first out) That is because the newest member of staff had served the least time, therefore hadn't as much experience or service with the company.
However that isn't always the way it is done. A good employer would assess the skills needs and experience necessary to fulfill the remaining role and invite all affected candidates who could be made redundant to apply for it.
Everyone is given the same opportunity and (technically at least) the employer chooses the candidate most suited to their needs.
Some enlightened employers may even offer Job Share so that both people get half the job, leavin them both free to go and get another part time job to make up the difference. Indeed, I would suggest that it may be a good thing for both employees yo suggest it to the employer - you never know they may say yes and everyone's happy.
2007-01-28 07:29:33 · answer #2 · answered by Wantstohelpu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Usually done by "last one in, first one out"
If they both started at the same time, it will be the one with the best attendence record, less times in trouble etc
2007-01-28 07:04:26 · answer #3 · answered by cybermoose1982 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gosh - if it's closing - everybody's redundant. No choosing required....Right?
2007-01-28 07:03:18 · answer #4 · answered by smiling_freds_biz_info 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm assuming that everyone else is being transferred to other facilities? I would think that they would go by seniority and work ethics.
2007-01-28 07:09:48 · answer #5 · answered by margarita 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the one that has been there the longest stays
2007-01-28 07:03:34 · answer #6 · answered by sunflare63 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the one with a mortage , children , should stay ,single one should go
2007-01-28 07:07:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋