Think of all the hard work this dedicated woman is doing, reading each and every one of her 37,000 +"Answers" responses to her question. I can`t wait ! What a gal !!!
2007-01-28 06:08:31 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In the first place, I can just about guarantee you that she hasn't seen the post, didn't make the post, won't be the one reading the responses, and won't be the one to pick "best answer." That's what staff members are for.
Just another political ploy to fool the American people into thinking she really cares about them and what they think.
2007-01-28 06:26:04 · answer #1 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If Hillary can't even satisfy her husband how can she satisfy America?
Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment...there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his Henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be good at making chocolate chip cookies... but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.
2007-01-28 14:34:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
She doesn't read those things. She has people do it for her. Then they will make a sheet of all the topics. They will go over them and she will try to find solutions and comment on them. She will then address the public with these "bright" ideas that came from low life like us. Hopefully she won't take the credit for thinking the things up. Then again it would be embarrassing for a presidential candidate to have to stoop to people level. On the other hand maybe that is a good thing. Listening to the people. WHO KNEW? I doubt she will pick one person. It will probably come up undecided or something. There might even be a few hundred planted names in there that were people in her "cabinet" so to speak so that no riots came of it later. I'm not saying I don't trust her. But think about it. If she picked one person over the other it would cause riots. People fight over everything. It would go from white or black or origin or whatever somebody wants to read into it. Let's face it. it would become POLITICAL!
2007-01-28 14:20:40 · answer #3 · answered by Me2 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Expect to see the BA be something supporting national health care, and then watch the Democrats try and argue that yahoo still isn't biased towards the (D)'s!!!
2007-01-28 14:16:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you think for one minutes that hillary wants our advise you are mistaken. If the best answer coincides with what she has planned that will be the one chosen. I know you know she isn't doing any of this reading on her own. I'm sure she has someone else doing it.
2007-01-28 14:21:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure she'll skip over mine as it has a strong republican anti- governmental twist on it
2007-01-28 14:27:11 · answer #6 · answered by rwill54287 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Heck, yes--- that's gonna be so funny!!! It'll probably be some liberal socialist!!
The really funny thing is that you actually think she IS the real Hillary Clinton!!! Oh, gosh...... it's so funny-- I had no idea liberals were so gullible!!!
I don't like her anyhow......
2007-01-28 14:36:20 · answer #7 · answered by i'm @ vertigo 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
And who really cares?
And last time I saw it earlier today it looked more like not even 3,700 answers
2007-01-28 14:16:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
That'll be Bill's job. LOL!
2007-01-28 14:25:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She probably answered it herself! and will pick it for best answer.
2007-01-28 14:18:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋