?
2007-01-28 05:01:32 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
OMG...start thinking for yourself.
NOT having to mention that it is an ALL VOLUNTEER military...
This is the most one sided war in all history. We lost more fighting men every day in WWI and WWII then we have in the entire Iraq war.
Thank GOD we didn't have idiotic liberals like you in the time of WWII. You people would be saying we shouldn't be there fighting.. What did they Germans ever do to us?...etc.
UUUGH!!! You people wont stop till we are all under the control of some fascist dictator. Then you will be b!tchin about that too...
2007-01-28 05:04:44 · answer #1 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 11⤊ 8⤋
Damn straight he is! Whose idea do you think this was? And yes congress did support his idea at first when they thought he was telling the TRUTH, and now they are all bent out of shape because they were lied to. Don't they all have aides that can do their dirty work for them and research these statements for factuality BEFORE they actually vote on something? Or was GW in such a rush that they didn't have time? GW, our commander in chief LIED to the entire United States of America for whom he is supposed to be the LEADER! Are we all happy we are stuck with him, NO! But is there anything we can do about it now that we are stuck in this war that he got us into? NO! Because if we leave the Iraqi people high and dry we're going to look like assholes who blew the crap out of a bunch of civilians and didn't have the decency to clean up our own mess. It is however true that these civilians are not making the cleanup easy, and I guess we just have our President to thank for the divisiveness that this war has caused both between americans and the rest of the world. I think it is important to support our men and women while they are over there because they didn't ask to go there. They are just doing their jobs. As for those who have lost their lives, it is unfortunate that has happened and our commander should be ashamed of himself for letting HIS idea get out of hand by letting innocent american soldiers die for his lies. Judgement day will come.
2007-01-28 06:05:48 · answer #2 · answered by sicilia 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What Nonalcoholic doesn't tell you in his long, tiresome list is that all of these people were LIED to and given cherry-picked intelligence that were also lies. Yes Bush, along with "the insurgents are in there last throws" Cheney and Rumsfeld share a lot of the blame for all of these deaths.
2007-01-28 06:03:36 · answer #3 · answered by Do You See What Happens Larry? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Congress voted for the resolution which includes the Democrats. No President Bush is not responsible for the deaths of US troops and it's President Bush with the B in his name in capitals. Ok now since we are over your lack of respect, the troops are over there because they want to be as they volunteered for the Armed Services. And the people responsible for the deaths of our troops are the Islamic fascists. Some people will never come to the light or see the truth for what is really is.
2007-01-28 05:10:15 · answer #4 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
No - Clinton is.
If he had done his job instead of doing female interns, there wouldn't have been a 9/11 with 3000+ civilian dead, and there wouldn't have been a need for this war, with 3000+ military casualties.
Also, the last time I checked, it was an all-volunteer military. And they are getting more and more recruits every day. Not draftees - recruits.
At least the Military understands and believes in what we are doing in Iraq.
2007-01-28 05:14:16 · answer #5 · answered by Lily VonSchtupp 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I'm not sure he realizes it, but he is. Some say the terrorists/insurgents blow them up. They couldn't do this unless the president sent them over there to die. How would we react if a foreign government's army was walking our streets? Would we really hug them and celebrate their presence? That is the fundamental issue Bush, and his sycophants, underestimated when they invaded and occupied Iraq. It is the price we pay every day as Americans.
2007-01-28 05:08:34 · answer #6 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋
If you put your hand in fire, is the fire to blame, or the hand to blame, or the brain behind the hand.
As we can see, it's anything but the brain.
2007-01-28 05:21:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where have you been for the last 6 years and 5 months? Hanging out with old Bill and his female companions? Ever heard of Osama Bin Laden? He is the answer to your question.
2007-01-28 05:08:27 · answer #8 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
No, he had to make a decision and he did so. God bless the troops who gave their lives, but they signed up to fight for their country knowing what the possibilities were, so I don't think those hero's would appreciate anyone degrading what they fought for.
2007-01-28 05:06:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
Yes he is
2007-01-28 10:58:07 · answer #10 · answered by joymlcat 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Amazing. Cons claim it was terrorists, regardless of the fact no Iraqi had anything to do with 9/11.
2007-01-28 05:08:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋