I hate MOPAR, I will never own a MOPAR again. I had a lemon and before it caught fire and burned up. I was on the phone with Detroit every week trying to get them to fix it properly.
2007-01-28 04:59:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Iceplayr 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
"I dont need any crybaby chrysler lovers pissing and moaning because they cant handle the truth."
OK, so what IS the truth? The fact of the matter here is that people buy what they are familiar with and have had the best of luck with. "Chrysler's Suck". Where are the facts to back up your claim, versus the "suck" factor of vehicles produced by GM and Ford? There is not ONE AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURER in the WORLD that has not produced at least ONE lemon in the company's lifetime (with the possible exception of non-mass-produced vehicles)....yes, even the high dollar European lines. Hence the need for recalls and organizations like the NTSB.
"Imports are better than American cars and have higher resale value"
Uh-huh. Let's compare the resale value of a Cadillac CTS-V and a Mitsubishi Lancer ES. And before you whine about the two examples not being in the same class, YOU are the one that is generalizing. What's "better" about import cars? Tell you what - take a look under the hood of your GM, Ford, or Chrysler and tell me that they are comprised of 100 percent American parts.
So, before anyone states that Chrysler (or any other automaker) sucks, please have specific documented proof as to why. If you don't, shut your hole and go away.
2007-01-29 14:55:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave G 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sounds like a loaded question. I'll answer anyway.
People are still buying Chryslers because they're tired of shelling out money for the insanely expensive Japanese cars.
They're also tired of the General Motors products falling apart on them, and the Fords constantly recalling their products.
Add to that, they also can't afford the European brands like Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Jaguar, and even Volkswagen ($70,000+ for a Volkswagen Phaeton?!? Why not a nice, $35,000, V-8, Rear-Wheel Drive 300C and enough money left over for a used Dodge Viper instead?).
Remember all the great Chrysler prodcuts of the past? The original Chrysler B-70 of the 1920s, the only car able to challenge Ford and Chevrolet in sales and quality? The Chrysler Airflow and DeSoto Airflow of the 1930s, the first cars specifically designed for aerodynamics to create better gas mileage and stability? The Chrysler C-300 and Plymouth Fury of the mid 1950s, with great power, sporty looks, and luxury aplenty? The late 1960s/early 1970s muslce cars, like the Chrysler Valiant E38, Dodge Challenger R/T and Charger R/T, Plymouth Hemi 'Cuda, Satellite, and my personal favorite, the Road Runner? And who can forget the Dodge Viper? Or even the new Chrysler 300C, the all-American, brash, fullsize sedan that flaunts itself in the face of Toyota Camrys and Honda Accords everywhere?
When will people stop mouthing off? When will YOU learn?
I guess a lot of people love putting noxious fumes into the atmosphere when the pull things out of their butt.
2007-01-28 13:12:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ryan B 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
Princess ashley bought herself( or maybe Daddy did) a 300m? well that just shows how much you know about cars. Did you get past page 50 on the manual before you figured out what the key was for?
Chrysler is still around because of loyalty & because they stand the test of time. Properly outfitted the 426 Hemi has & does still put chev & ford out to lunch and don't even get me started on imports. Can you say rice rockets? I'd like to see a 1960's import on the road somewhere (other than on the back of a tow truck)!
2007-01-29 00:08:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by dlb_biker 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I purchased a 2005 Sebring 2 years ago, and I love it.
Nice styling, smooth acceleration. I got a great price and a full warranty.
I don't have anything bad to say about Daimler Chrysler so far.
Any automobile make has its bad and its good. You can't make blanket statements. However, I do think I'll take a longer look at Toyota or Honda next time around.
2007-01-28 17:26:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
LOL chryslers do suck ! The new 2008 Challenger will be a big hit for them. It's sweet. The cummings turbo diesel is a awesome motor but look at the metal box around the motor. Those trucks are so UGLY. Have a nice Day !
2007-01-28 13:02:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by rjarobins 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
chrysler makes some of the best vehicles, and also some of the worst. for instance, a chrylser LHS/dodge intrepid with the 3.5 liter engine will last over 200,000 miles easily. but, one with the 2.7 liter engine will surely fail within the first 50,000 miles. I really don't know why people are still buying them...they are way behind ford and GM and now they're also behind toyota too.
2007-01-28 13:30:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well there a little better than Fords. Also It sure beats some Jap,Korean piece of junk.Germany wants to much for there stuff and besides you have to be a stuck idiot to but there junk. Unless it's a VW and there girl cars.Or for guys that want to be girls. That leaves GM and they haven't made anything except for the Vette that I would buy in a long time. Long live used cars!!
2007-01-28 13:03:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
i worked for a chrysler dlr for 14 years and would never own one they are made of the cheepest crap on the planet not even enough quality to get through warranty
2007-01-31 02:35:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by mjmik1 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i am a happy owner of a 1972 PLYMOUTH ROADRUNNER with a 340 SMALL BLOCK V-8 pushing 850 hp to the rear wheels. It will DRANG ANY IMPORT, FORD, CHEVY and ANYTHING you put up to it, even you grandmothers caddy. MOPARS are the best thing since yo momma
2007-01-29 10:41:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bird 2
·
1⤊
1⤋