CEO's get billion dollar Salary's and the, Cons approve. The numbers o fworking poor are on the rise, Cons approve.. Is it time for an American monarchy???
2007-01-28 04:32:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
King George and the Monarchists goosestepping down washington avenue................ Eureka!
2007-01-28 04:41:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
What is your solution? Unfortunately you need those billionaires, they create the jobs and the opportunities the rest of us depend on. The dems have been fighting this war on poverty for 30 years, with no success. Creating more entitlement programs and making more people dependent on government hasn't worked and will never work. I see why you ride the short bus.
Liberals_Celebrate_Abo...- I hear ya girl, but why must he be ugly? Implying that only the beautiful can be right. I find it amazing that how you look is the one thing in life that you HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH and yet everyone takes the most credit for it! Other than that, your post was spot on!
2007-01-28 12:39:03 · answer #2 · answered by Chester's Liver 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why do liberals feel the need to punish those who have worked hard and are now successful? Is it because the liberals know that they don't have the ability/talent/determination/work ethic to achieve the same success and need to find some way to make themselves feel better? Grow up!
2007-01-28 12:48:08 · answer #3 · answered by krustykrabtrainee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fine with me.
Then we can return to being a serfdom, kick out the illegal aliens, and I can have serfs cleaning my toilets and picking my lettuce.
PS - it isn't a Plutocracy, otherwise we wouldn't have the House & Senate, and the States wouldn't have governors or be able to pass their own legislation.
2007-01-28 12:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by Lily VonSchtupp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Monarchy? So is that why you want another Clinton in office?
2007-01-28 12:45:00 · answer #5 · answered by chickyboom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Do I need to type down that 1 800 number for you again?
2007-01-28 12:35:49 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Right...you know...because when John F. Kennedy was in office, his family wasn't implied to be royal, with the term "Camelot" and such...
2007-01-28 12:38:50 · answer #7 · answered by The Cult of Personality 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe we are already there.
2007-01-28 12:42:14 · answer #8 · answered by planksheer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no an BOSTON TEA PARTY
2007-01-28 12:36:08 · answer #9 · answered by WMD LIEr W 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋