If i invest 100 Rs. in ULIPs how much is actual investment and how much the process expenses?

Answer 1

Here is an UPDATE:
Do you know that there is a term called 'minimum premium payable' in any ULIP (Unit Linked Insurance Plan) that you buy from a life insurance company? If you don't know about this term, please read each word very carefully. If you have a ULIP or plan to buy one in the near future, reading this piece could change your life. Given that we are in the tax planning season and that many advisors would be calling on us constantly, it is more than critical that we precisely understand this special feature of a ULIP policy. It is most likely that your friendly life insurance agent / bank advisor will never tell you about this aspect of the policy. Let's understand why?

Also let us find out how Mr. Rajesh Singh (named changed) lost Rs. 24 lakh just like that and when he learnt about it, he felt completely infuriated, vexed, cheated and totally let down by his private banking relationship managers and sales personnel from the leading private life insurance provider from whom he bought this policy.

Here's how?

Rajesh is 32 years old and is a private banking customer of a leading private sector bank. He earns quite well and can be easily classified as amongst those people who are sought after by each and every person wanting to sell a product and earning a fat commission from that sale. For these advisors, their sole objective in life is achievement of their targets – that is all that matters. The only important thing for them is to make fast bucks and cut out huge commission deals for themselves at the cost of naïve individuals like Rajesh.

Rajesh bought a ULIP policy from a leading life insurance provider. The premium he paid and will pay in years to come is astounding Rs. 3 lakh per annum. This is paid in one shot each year – it is not distributed on a monthly basis. The insurance cover he has is Rs. 15 lakh. So how did the advisors rob him? Well, the economics works like this. When you buy a ULIP policy, there is a charge you pay each year. It is quite steep in the first year and gradually reduces in subsequent years. In Rajesh's case, the charge in the first year was 18% of his premium i.e. Rs. 54,000 was taken away as charges. Now, from the balance Rs. 2.46 lakh, some money would be apportioned towards providing him the life insurance benefit and balance would get invested as per his chosen allocation of 100% equity. This type of arrangement was completely in the interest of the advisors.

Here how things could have been better had the advisors given fair and correct advice :

Mr. Singh could have been told that Rs 20,000 was the minimum premium payable and given that he had about Rs 3 lakh to invest the balance Rs. 2.8 lakh could have been deployed into the policy as a top-up. On the basis of this arrangement, he would be charged 20% on his annual premium of Rs 20,000 i.e. Rs 4,000 and 1% on his top-up of Rs 2.8 lakh i.e. Rs. 2800. The total charges in this case would have been Rs 6,800. Against this, he was charged Rs 54,000 because the entire amount was taken to be his premium instead of splitting the amount as premium of Rs 20,000 and top-up of Rs 2.8 lakh.

Now, you can quite clearly see that if the commission paid by the life insurance company is a % of the charges – then the advisors stand to gain based on the charges that you pay. Hence it is in their interest to give you advice whereby their ulterior motive is maximised. Mr. Singh would have saved Rs. 47,200 (i.e. difference between Rs. 54,000 and Rs. 6,800). If Mr. Singh then invested this Rs. 47,200 for 28 years i.e. upto his age of retirement and if he earned say 15% returns (as he is an equity investor) he would have gained a wealth of Rs. 24 lakh approximately.

This arrangement would have made no difference to his life insurance benefit – given that he is 32 years of age the policy would be absolutely ok. Any insurance company can easily verify this.

Why does this happen? In the insurance industry targets to sales person are given in terms of policies sold and/or FYP (First Years Premium). So the agents have to try their best to get the client to fork out a large sum of money as regular premium. The higher the amount they garner, not only do they achieve their targets but what also follows is hefty bonuses, promotion in ranks of the company which translates into more money and not to mention the fully paid international holidays. All this is at the expense of ordinary people like you and me. And then we are told 'Buyer Beware'. The question we then come to is - Is their no moral – no ethics – no social responsibility? The insurance company does not care as it stands to gain quite a lot as it gets larger amount of money as charges. The bank does not care as it earns the fat commission and the sales person stands to achieve his target and earn a bonus for himself – all this at the cost of Rajesh.

Now if you are the proud owner of a ULIP – go back and check the premium you pay and find out the minimum premium that is payable for your policy. If your advisor tells you that you have done the right thing and that you just need to pay the premium for three years so on and so forth – be warned your charges are very high, the stock markets may crash – your policy can become worthless and because you will not pay the premiums post three years the policy can also lapse in years to come. Three years of premium payment is a marketing tool for advisors to entice you to commit for just three years and they laugh all the way to the bank. It is far better to pay the minimum premium for a minimum of three years and ideally pay it for about 10-15 years – thereafter chances are that you will not need to worry with respect to your insurance benefit.

Having said all of the above the message would be incomplete if we did not mention that ULIP is per say a great product and must be used well for its multitude of advantages. Rajesh bought the right product but wrong doings, malpractices of such commission hungry leeches of advisors cost Mr. Singh Rs. 24 lakh of potential wealth.

**********************OLD ANSWER BELOW*********************
Typically, any insurance product will have somewhere between 40% and 80% taken away in the first 1 to 5 years from your investment. Simply take a look at the illustration that is given during the 'selling stage'. That is the commissions of the agent. Now there are many new products on the market that have gotten smarter by annuitizing those expenses over the first 10 years, but regardless it is there (hidden somewhere).

Why not buy Insurance, and Invest the Rest of the money seperately into a mutual fund account? It gets down to the same thing.

These products are ONLY for people who do not know ANYTHING about Insurance and Investment, AND, who do not want to learn since they are too busy 'creating wealth'. Then these expenses should not matter to that individual anyways.

Be careful.....Look at alternatives.....Search for other competitive products.....Think about you 'creating' it yourself and trying to make 1+1 = 2.1 instead of 1+1 = 1.6!!!!!!

There is a bit of exagerration above, but I have investigated enough of these in my life, that I have given up on those fancy salespeople who are willing to come home and not leave when you say NO!!!!!

KKP

Answer 2

Conventional wisdom says that Insurance and Investing needs are two different aspects and need not be mixed.

I would suggest that you keep your Investment and Insurance requirements separate.