I truly believe it was the current resident of the White House who needed 9/11 to hang his presidency on.
If it wasn't for 9/11 he would have never stayed in office.
He would have surely been impeached a long time ago, especially after Cheney ordered exposing the identity of an under-cover CIA agent, simply because her husband told Bush there were no WMD's in Iraq.
.
2007-01-28 03:43:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
The attacks were inspired by late-night discussions around the campfires at Bohemian Grove. Some of Ryadh's finest were invited to California for the weekend, decided it would be a good way to get money rolling through Saudi Arabia and, as an added bonus, stir up several billion in defense contracts.
2007-01-28 06:02:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by we5rowboats 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
the reply is not any... Did the 186 Russian little ones killed in 9/01/04 Beslan college bloodbath need to die? I propose, the Russians promote billions of funds in militia kit to armies all over the realm, a concepts more desirable than what the U. S. has bought to his allies in Europe, Asia and the middle East; they destroyed entire villages in Afghanistan interior the Nineteen Nineteen Seventies and murdered 1000's of 1000's of people in jap Europe in the course of the chilly conflict. THe Russians also propped up the authorities in jap Germany, who tortured and executed 1000's of East Germans in the course of the Fifties, 60s and outfitted a wall that shackled jap Germany because the Fifties. And what about the chinese? Did both,six hundred scholars that died interior the Tianamen sq. bloodbath in 1989 need to die? maximum of those youthful pupil professional-democracy activists are languishing in prisons in Manchuria or have fled to Europe and the U. S. for his or her anti-communist perspectives and some were even killed for voicing their discontent adverse to the Beijing's reppresive authorities and yet, we purchase tens of millions of funds in customer products made in China, likely made less than slave complicated artwork. And what about North Korea? what number harmless people have had to flee into exile and stay on the run because of Pyonyang's repressive authorities? what number jap civilians were abducted through North Korean brokers and compelled to coach North Korean spies on their personal way of life less than worry of torture and execution? What about the Spaniards that were killed interior the three/11/04 practice bombings of Madrid? The British voters that were killed interior the 7/07/05 bus bombings in London? The Jordanians that were killed interior the 11/09/05 inn bombings in Amman and the Indonesians that were killed interior the ten/12/02 hotel bombings in Bali? You thump your chest denouncing the U. S. authorities as a BOMBER usa and yet you ignore about those data. the actuality may be patriotic, yet your actuality is seditious at perfect. i'm achieved right here.
2016-10-16 05:26:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by vergeer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, that's a very good question. The FBI has said publicly that they can find no evidence linking Osama to 9/11, interesting eh? Then you have the fact that all 19 hijackers were Arab, no Iraqi, not Afghan's, or Pakistan's, Arabs. Here's an idea, maybe something like project Northwoods gave the attackers there inspiration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
2007-01-28 03:55:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Third Uncle 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
The United States were behind the 9/11 attacks, hanging the blame on CIA operative Tim Osman (aka Osama bin Laden).
2007-01-28 04:23:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by jswnwv 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
At first I thought that it was the Afghanis. But when I heard on the news that bombs were recorded going off in the WTC's shortly before the planes hit, I believe that for political reasons, our Government may have been behind it. It makes me sick, but I do not trust Bush at ALL, and I think he'd stop at NOTHING to get what he wants.
2007-01-28 03:47:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bud's Girl 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
This is really a stupid question. There has always been war and there will always continue to be war.
It appears you are condemning war. War is a necessary evil because other people want to fight. If we could live in peace, think of how much good people could accomplish. Instead of building tanks and teaching people how to use them, we could be building tractors and teaching African natives how to feed themselves. Instead of building military compounds, we could build hospitals and schools.
But, we are not living in peace. Never have, and never will. So let's bring out the big guns and have at it.
2007-01-28 03:45:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by jack-copeland@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Project for the New American Century planned it with the Saudis.
2007-01-28 05:20:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by neooxyconservative 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Don't get into a pissing contest with a skunk. Don't accept your premise.
2007-01-28 03:44:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sgt 524 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you are on the right track, fundamentalism of any form is the enemy...
2007-01-28 07:02:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by squeegie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋