Not for visiting an enemy nation during armed conflict with her birthright country,but for allowing herself to be photographed with an enemy soldiers helmet on while sitting on an anti-aircraft gun pointing at the sky when her birthright country's aircraft might come along at any moment,thus giving said enemy country vast amounts of propoganda?....If not,why wouldnt you consider that being a traitor?....
2007-01-28 03:35:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The relevance to any issue is not a part of the question...its a yes/no/why question....relevance in a crime has no bearing
2007-01-28 03:43:05 · update #1
Jane Fonda did indeed commit traitorous acts during the Vietnam war. According to the Constitution of the United States, a traitor is defined as anyone who wages war against the United States or gives our enemies aid and comfort. It can not be denied that she did indeed give them both aid and comfort by posing for propaganda photos and doing propaganda broadcasts on communist ran radio stations.
Those on here who have said that the supposed violations of her First Amendment rights (she has no right under the First Amendment to travel to an enemy nation and give them aid) is of more concern are clearly ignorant of the law and what does or does not constitute an act of treason. Ignore them.
2007-01-28 03:53:58 · answer #1 · answered by anarchisthippy 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
For her visit to Hanoi in 1967, absolutely. She committed acts that are the very definition of treason. She should have been arrested at the airport immediately upon her return and put on trial for treason.
For what she did at the rally yesterday, no. She has every right to voice her opinion and demonstrate against the government. Those rights are guaranteed to her in the Constitution.
I just find it absolutely abhorrent and sickening that she is so free to exercise these rights while stabbing in the backs the men and women who fight and die to protect those rights.
She's a total disgrace as an American. Just the sight of her makes me want to vomit.
2007-01-28 06:02:13 · answer #2 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because she apparently visited Viet Nam and when our prisoners of war passed bits of paper to her with their social security numbers on them, she turned around and handed those over to the enemy. Those men were tortured as a result and some died.
She is a traitor.
2007-01-28 03:44:04 · answer #3 · answered by martinmagini 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Yes she is a Traitor! I am from the mid 60's 70's and know her behavior is not Pro America....put her in Jail!
2007-01-28 03:40:31 · answer #4 · answered by snickers 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋
How could a traitor be named as one of the top 100 women of the Century???? Makes you wanna puke a little.
2007-01-28 03:40:25 · answer #5 · answered by jaypea40 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
YES! also didnt she visit a POW camp and not tell the location of it?
Fireing squad.
2007-01-28 03:39:38 · answer #6 · answered by Jack P 3 · 8⤊ 0⤋
I believe she is a traitor. Treason is punishable by death, so she is lucky the government is not going after her. I wish she would stop siding with communists and so on and making our country look bad. She is really annoying.
2007-01-28 03:38:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Millions did...however, that was over 30 years ago.
2007-01-28 03:38:58 · answer #8 · answered by Kiss My Shaz 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yea, she back to her old game, now will have to start calling her Baghdad Jane.
2007-01-28 03:39:58 · answer #9 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 8⤊ 0⤋
I am editing out my answer because I have learned through experience the questioner is just the type to hit me for a violation. Why try to talk to someone with their mind shut tight? But I refuse to delete my answer. That is my own type of protest.
2007-01-28 03:40:47 · answer #10 · answered by marie 7 · 0⤊ 6⤋