English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It seems their thirst for power knows little bounds. The once great Democratic party has dona an about face and Kennedy is probably turning over in his grave.

The vast majority of Democrats in this country feel the leaders of their party are truly representing them. I feel they are being duped into a socialistic party.

2007-01-28 03:15:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

War monger?
Iran is the government that insists it is there purpose to facilitate the return of Allah and called for the destruction of the infidel governments of Israel and America.

That sounds more like war mongering to me Steve.

2007-01-28 05:05:21 · update #1

6 answers

Yup, I agree.
If the Democrats were in power in the 1860s they would still be debating a resolution to conedemn the South for slavery.
Oh wait, they all walked out of Congress to try and leave the U.S. to start their own country..
Don't get their way, they try to take their toys and go home!
The best part is people say Republicans are racist and anti-minority. At least they have the freedom to do that now thanks to LIncoln!

2007-01-28 03:22:25 · answer #1 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 2 2

That's great...a Donkey's *** is their symbol now and the Ostrich symbol would be more relevant!

Glad to see there are rational folks out there that know what the Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Hyper-Liberals stand for!

Any party that would put that clown Howard Dean as the Head of their Party has got to have a serious problem in character assessment!

2007-01-28 11:29:17 · answer #2 · answered by baltic072 3 · 1 0

What scares me more than the rhetoric coming out of Iran is the rhetoric coming from people in this country who know nothing about Iran or its government or it's politics. Yet they're ready to rush into another war because the right wing commentators on TV and radio say it's necessary and / or inevitable. They are lemmings who will ultimately get a lot of innocent people killed, Iranian and American.

2007-01-28 11:36:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No, no maybe it should be the symbol of a negotiator while the Republican symbol can be a symbol of a war monger.

2007-01-28 11:55:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

BULLSEYE!!
You need to add to that symbol.
A terrorists standing real close behind that ostrich , with his pants down.

2007-01-28 11:22:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

If the shoe fits. wear it.

2007-01-28 11:22:00 · answer #6 · answered by DeSaxe 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers