As I understand it, the Brits can overturn their government in a day, and the former prime minister has to vacate No. 10 Downing Street immediately. Wouldn't Americans be better off if we could do that with failed presidents? For now only impeachment, which has never worked, can rid us of a failed president who refuses to resign when the people have given him a vote of no confidence.
2007-01-28 03:07:17 · 5 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Few americans realise it ...they think the USA is great!!!
They never consider that our system of government could be improved.
The USA is closer to a monarchy the the Brits......
Qualifications for becoming a US President....NONE....ZERO...except for IMAGE and Money...no experience required......none...
2007-01-28 03:16:23 · answer #1 · answered by T - blaster 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would say Britain's form of government is less responsive- being a full parlimentary system, the MP's vote for who the prime minister will be, not the people- you only get to vote for one representative based on where you live.
2007-01-28 03:12:17 · answer #2 · answered by plunger 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the system is very similar, the only difference is that the Prime Minister is not elected individually, but selected by his party.
Both systems are democratic, and both don't really work in the modern world of bribery and corruption.
2007-01-28 03:12:10 · answer #3 · answered by Boston Bluefish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we were that good the sad sack of liberal tax wackos we have running my country would of been out on their asses by now.
2007-01-28 03:11:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They have a QUEEN for chrissakes!
2007-01-28 05:37:00 · answer #5 · answered by coconutmonkeybank 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋