I know Nadal has a chance, but still he's not a convincing favorite,is he?What about fernando gonzalez?
2007-01-28 02:56:02 · 15 answers · asked by arun m 2 in Sports ➔ Tennis
I think the US Open and Wimbledon titles are his for the taking. Blake is no match for Federer.
I think that on clay, Nadal has the highest chance among the rest of the players to prevent him from conquering the French Open. Nalbandian has a smidgen of a chance too. You also have to take note that Federer won the last 2 meetings between him and Nadal, though they were not on clay. It's got to provide some sort of psychological advantage to Federer.
But if Federer continues like he did during the Australian Open, no one is going to stop him from dominating even more than he did in 2004 and 2006.
2007-01-28 03:49:49 · answer #1 · answered by rfedrocks 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As great as Federer is, he will have a tough time winning the French.
As great as Sampras was, he had the same problem. Granted that Fed is better than Pete, but not by that much.
If he can get through the French without playing Nadal or Nalbandian, he can win, but either of those two has a very good chance of beating him on clay.
The thing is, Federer's also a very smart player. He will have some time during the early clay court season to adjust his game. But it will still be tough vs. the clay court specialists.
If he wins the French, though, game over. The slam should be his. Yeah, Blake can play him in the US Open, but Fed will treat him the same way he treated Roddick in Aussie Open, put a total beatdown on him.
2007-01-28 03:15:44 · answer #2 · answered by H_A_V_0_C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i individually wish Federer wins a Grand Slam next 12 months and if I had to %. which Grand Slams i might choose him to win it could be the French Open or Wimbledon. yet thinking which Grand Slams he has the main suitable risk of triumphing i might say the U. S. Open or Australian Open. possibly even Wimbledon despite the fact that he has misplaced interior the Quarter-Finals the final 2 years. yet whilst Roger Federer can shop the fulfillment he's having now going into 2012 i think of he might win the Australian Open next 12 months.
2016-12-17 04:26:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rafael Nadal of SPAIN is probably the best tennis player that could stop Roger Federer in his tracks to win all 3 Grand Slams of the year.
2007-01-29 00:47:53 · answer #4 · answered by foongwk140804 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...
French Open - Nadal is a VERY convincing favorite - I don't think he will lose on clay for 3 more years.
Wimbledon - Nadal will win at Wimbledon after Federer is tired from a long match against Ancic in the semi-finals.
US Open - Roddick will get shredded in the finals as Federer is master of hard courts and Nadal is master of "specialty" courts.
2007-01-28 05:46:32 · answer #5 · answered by Beast8981 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Federer is w/o question one fo the greatest ever. The problem is that there are not any other truly great players out there. Perhaps if one of the top players has the match of their life they can take out Federer if he has an off day.
2007-01-28 10:25:47 · answer #6 · answered by dtshaff 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only player out there who can beat Federer is Federer himself.
He's a machine and the best EVAR!
2007-01-28 04:53:29 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He won't win them all, Nadal is unbeatable on clay, and James Blake is going to make a run in the U.S. Open.
2007-01-28 02:59:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would be surprised of Roger won the French. Not his surface.
2007-01-28 04:09:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't think anyone has got any chance of defeating roger federer in any match. he is the best player i hv ever seen.he can play any choice and his placement and shot selection is brilliant
2007-01-28 03:02:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋