Oh my! Why can't we just all get along. Why don't we appoint a sensitivity committee to determine why they did this. Then we can hold out the olive branch of peace and apologize for being the Big Bad United States and send them some of our own peoples hard earned money to make them feel better for us.
This I beleive would be liberal response number 1.
Number 2:
Blame the attack on the policies of the previous admin and stick our head in the sand.
2007-01-28 02:46:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by pretender59321 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They do not oppose taking action against those who attacked the U.S., they are opposed to fighting countries who WERE NOT involved. Bush has accused a few countries of being linked to 9/11, but he has been wrong every time.
2007-01-28 10:52:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ashley 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It all depends on who in there and what the situation is. I am sure they will spend more time try to figure out who really did the attack and go after those people without invading countries that had nothing to do with it.
2007-01-28 10:46:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by sydb1967 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Meow...you are one naughty Kat! Shame on you for the visual of their position.
Islamic fascists have been attacking the W.T.C. since '93...
All the attacks on America's military and embassies world wide were "left " for someone else to deal with.
China's new found missile guidance systems and N.Korea's introduction into the nuclear age...Courtesy of democratic caving and cowardice.
America can thank Clinton, Albright...and the despot loving closet traitor that delivered nukes to N.Korea...Jimmy Carter!
ALL of today's problems...ALL of them!...Originated in the failed worthless socialist agendas of America's failed democratic left!
2007-01-28 11:13:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their plan would be:
-Hide in a closet
-Negotiate with the attackers
-Not strike back
Outcome:
-Terrorists take over country
-Other countries laugh
2007-01-28 10:44:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If its Hillary, she will try to appease the enemy as we get hit multiple times on our soil.
2007-01-28 10:45:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by charles 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
terms of surrender most likely
2007-01-28 10:43:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that "under" is the most appropriate term.
2007-01-28 10:43:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Cut, run, surrender, die by the sword of islam....
2007-01-28 10:49:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they would take the cue from their heroes, the french. they would surrender.
2007-01-28 10:44:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by 007 4
·
0⤊
0⤋