What you find of these false interpretations and defective arguments?

Question

Some say that the Sun does not lose energies, only its energy are transformed. Others say that the Hydrogen of the Sun is burnt and transformed into helium, equal the millions of atomic bombs blowing up, but it ignores that the bombs do not remain unbroken as the Sun. Others say that the Sun anger to erase to the 10 million years for loses of energies. Still others speak that the Sun and the surplus of the explosion of the Big Bang.

Answer 1

The fundamental law of energy says that energy cannot be created or destroyed it merely changes form.
Hydrogen atoms fuse together to make helium atoms. This is called a fusion reaction.
Hydrogen bombs are fission reactions, reactions that cause the hydrogen atom to split, releasing enormous energy.
Our sun has enough hydrogen fuel in it to last about 10 billion years.
EVERYTHING in the universe is the surplus of the big bang.

Answer 2

To say that the sun "burns" hydrogen is actually technically incorrect. That term is more or less used for convenience and is meant more metaphorcally. Hydrogen is fused into helium. The burning metaphor is somewhat appropriate because hydrogen is consumed to make something else (Helium in this case) and energy is released. The big difference though is that burning is a chemical reaction usually referring to rapid exothermic oxidation, whereas the sun undergoes fusion which is far different.

The sun has enough fuel for 10 *billion* years, it's used up about 4.5 billion years of it so far.

Answer 3

arent all arugments defective whats the point highley illogical caption

Answer 4

Some of your examples were true and some were not..