These books argue that mathematics and science are meaningless because at the very heart of them are paradoxes and self-contradfictions which undermine them but which they just ignore
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/gamahucher_press_catalogue.htm
2007-01-28 01:41:26 · 7 answers · asked by ann 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
I think you probably didn't get good grades in either.
2007-01-28 01:48:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you read the definition of "paradox" and consider that you posted your own question using a computer employing amazing science, it would be a paradox if science was in fact meaningless. It is said that a cut watermelon looks round or ovalic depending on how you cut it. A paradox is often two points of view or even opinions. Science seeks the "logical" truth.
2007-01-28 10:14:20 · answer #2 · answered by Kes 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're asking this while using a computer and a network that work because science and mathematics work. Stuff like this often takes a view that science and math are no good because you can twist words around. Of course they were written and printed on machines that work because...., by people that have the leisure to play these games because....
Frankly I'd rather read stuff about science and mathematics that works.
2007-01-29 02:19:30 · answer #3 · answered by Bob 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is currently the only disciplines of philosophy we have for intelligently interacting with the known universe and the reality of that which humanity experiences. Perhaps we should learn that 50% of anything we try to understand as fact breaks down when we try to engage in mass comprehension. Concepts, ideologies and beleif systems convolute the ability to make non-bias, objective observations about physical reality and the established laws that govern it. As Enstein tried to explain in context of mathmatics and scientific theory, every observer/person occupies there own unique place in space/time that no other can. Their perspective of time is unique to them, their reference.
So no two people can share the same perspective of physical matter, energy and time.
2007-01-28 10:02:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mathematics is a language, with definitions and syntax.. and some things are just not defined yet... and why would I want to look at your catalog? I don't do many links.
2007-01-28 09:46:48 · answer #5 · answered by ♥Tom♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL....what unmitigated crap. We're supposed to take that seriously when every citation in the "book" is his own work? Really, every footnote is a reference to another one of his own self-absorbed papers. How big of a joke is this guy? LOL...
2007-01-28 10:04:34 · answer #6 · answered by Beach_Bum 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they don't. That book is a pile of doo-doo.
2007-01-30 17:11:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋