English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-28 01:27:44 · 12 answers · asked by imtiaz7circle c 1 in Politics & Government Government

12 answers

Not in particular. Nobody "likes" war but nonetheless, we are in one and need to do whatever it takes to "win", retreat would be a poor option.

2007-01-28 01:33:16 · answer #1 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0 3

Hell No We should not have been in Iraq in the 1st place Now that we are Bush has no clue as to how to get us out We have made a bad situation there even worse since we have been there Groups such as Al Quida were not in Iraq before the U.S. invasion. If all we wanted to do was take out Saddam We should have given the Iraqi.s the means to do it themselves without involving U.S. troops

2007-01-28 01:38:39 · answer #2 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 1 0

Of course. With more Iraqis dead than died under Saddam Hussein's rule, what's not to like? Not to mention the fact that all the soldiers who come back from Iraq without bodyparts will have an easier time passing their weigh-in. But those are just fringe benefits - if the entire Middle East collapses, they'll be so busy annihilating each other they won't even have time to think about blowing up our buildings. And what's even better is that Islam will no longer be the fastest-growing religion, so we won't need to launch another crusade for at least the next couple of decades!

2007-01-28 01:38:03 · answer #3 · answered by na n 3 · 1 1

The US President's Policy on Iraq, biggest fraud played on the World in the name of elimination of nonexistent WMD. The result is unnecessary loss of human Life of many countries, destruction of of Nation, murder of its Leader. With all these who could like the Policy of US President on Iraq. War is destruction, no body can support it.

2007-01-28 01:30:39 · answer #4 · answered by Brahmanyan 5 · 1 2

So much policy and interest for the better of USA. USA is being paid to be in Iraq so whats the worry?

2007-01-28 01:32:15 · answer #5 · answered by George Manheaven 2 · 0 2

They have a policy on Iraq?

2007-01-28 01:31:47 · answer #6 · answered by Im a killer 2 · 2 1

No way, shape or form.

I'm a veteran from the Vietnam era and this president's policies are very reminiscent of Richard (I am noit a crook) Nixon.

.

2007-01-28 01:38:48 · answer #7 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 0 1

No. It's time we stopped wasting money and resources in Iraq and strike at the root of the problem......Iran.

2007-01-28 01:31:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No. It's impossible for a stone-age nation to be stable and have a humane government. Any country ruled by 'warlords' will never be stabilized.

2007-01-28 01:33:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't know if I like it or not but as a patrotic Born Again Christian I need to respect the president. Even if you support it or not or complian and not. They will still send troops over seas to fight or help the country out.

2007-01-28 01:37:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers