English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Evolutionist taunt scoffers for failure to see the proof. Where is the absolute proof? How did life form on this planet to evolve through the genetic chain to become homo-sapien?

2007-01-28 01:10:05 · 3 answers · asked by ? 4 in Social Science Anthropology

3 answers

You also asked this question on the religion board. There were many other responses there. It almost makes you presume that evolution is a religious science.

I have copied my answer from there here, so that others may see it.

Great question.

from the other board:

There are gaps in the fossil record. So, if you look past the gaps, you could see MacroEvolution if you wanted to.

There is not a "missing link" as much as one is needed.

98% genetic link to monkeys does not make us a monkey. That is like saying since a home is built of bricks and mortar, all buildings are alike. There is no way a house could ever be confused with a Chrysler Building (even though the principles of construction are the same).


A deviation of one bit of the genetic code would make you a freak, and unless you were able to reproduce with the species that you came from, your line would not be carried on. So, if there were genetic modifications in the code they would ultimately breed themselves out - as only the best and strongest get to reproduce in the wild.

Proof of Microevolution- Horses - during the age of the dinosaurs, they were about the size of a small dog. Yet today, they are as big as a door. But, throughout the ages, a horse is a horse.

More proof of microevolution-look at the different species of bears, dogs, cats, moths, birds. But they are still bears, cats, dogs, moths, or birds.

2007-01-28 02:14:49 · answer #1 · answered by Christmas Light Guy 7 · 0 1

If you knew anything about biology or evolution, or bothered to read any of the immense literature on the subject, you wouldn't ask such a silly question. I'm tired of explaining things to people who are too intellectually lazy to learn them on their own or in school. Revel in your own ignorance, take joy in the fact that you don't even understand that against which you argue. You're only hurting yourself.

2007-01-28 02:02:26 · answer #2 · answered by forbidden_planet 4 · 2 1

There is no "conclusive evidence". There is a little persuasive evidence, but not much of that.

2007-01-28 01:18:32 · answer #3 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers