Especially lately, I have marvleled at Bush's laserlike focus of telling it like it is, that terrorists want to kill us and recognizing that this fight won't end anytime soon. Even as poll after poll comes out saying Bush's approval is sagging, there he is telling us how important winning this struggle against islamofacism is to the future of civilization.
Even the words he uses to describe this struggle are sharp and delebrite. I am telling you, this leadership will be missed. There is no way the next Commander in Chief will be as driven on this issue.
If at some point, the terrorists are defeated and the middle east becomes liberalized, Bush will be recognized as an oracle and hero.
2007-01-27 21:00:09 · 21 answers · asked by American Bad Ass 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
People hated FDR until after the war...People hated Lincoln & Washington too ......PEOPLE have hated every GREAT leader throughout US History.......Clueless people of the world and libtards of the USA LOVE TO HATE BUSH and BLAME AMERICA FIRST for everything bad that happens in the world. After all, its the IN thing to do.....Bash America is nothing new....This is just another cycle.
Years from now, Bush will be considered a great leader by historians everywhere for having the guts and vision to fight the war on terror whereever they lie and whichever country harbors and aides them.....
2007-01-28 01:02:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think you are bit confused, mate.
Bush focused his energy on attacking Iraq. He attacked claiming Iraq was a great threat, and it has consumed almost all his energy and attention. But, Iraq was not a threat.
No WMD. No yellowcake. No uranium tubes. No Serin gas. No weapons labs. Drones that wouldn't sell on eBay.
So, he has not waged a relentless war on terror. If he really were interested in eliminating the terror threat, here's some things he would do totally differently:
+ Focus on Afghanistan and Bin Laden rather than a harmless third world country floating on oil.
+ Rebuke Israel for expansion, wall, and attack of Lebanon rather than encouraging it.
+ Question ties with Saudi royalty.
+ Diplomacy with North Korea, China to stem nuclear threat from Kim Jung Il.
+ Diplomacy with Syria, Iran and all other countries that are not our friends to work for peace in Middle East.
Et cetera. Bush's actions could much more accurately be described as a wanton escalation of terror. His actions could be construed, independent of the claims and propoganda, as a mass escalation of terror, violence.
For more evidence to this effect, consult the works of Noam Chomsky. You are severely confused if you think Bush has made America more safe while in office.
He strengthened Iran through the Iraqi war. He ignored domestic threats like the weather events Katrina and such that are a direct results of global warming and fossil fuel use. He stopped talking about Bin Laden for a stretch of about 3 years. Didn't utter his name even once. He has done nothing to secure our ports. He claims the war on terror is centered in Iraq when there are almost zero terrorists in Iraq, and he knows 95% or more of the violence is due to insurgents and sectarians.
So, your question is really out there, man. You have been duped in the extreme. Wake up and smell the coffee, brother.
The best thing Bush could do to combat terror would be to resign and have a lobotomy so he can't influence someone else with his tactics.
2007-01-27 23:24:19 · answer #2 · answered by Murphy 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
you at the instant are not meant to talk like that around right here. Please do no longer point out information approximately Clinton. He became a great guy in many libs eye's. He raised taxes on the middle type and did no longer do a element approximately terrorism for 8 years. What a pacesetter.
2016-11-01 11:55:03 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think he'll be missed at all. First of all, he didn't fight relentlessly against terror because he invaded the wrong country, Iraq, and created a terrorist nest where one didn't exist before. Terrorism has been on the rise since Mr. Bush has been President and I see very little accomplishment, other than rhetoric in that area.
2007-01-27 21:47:59 · answer #4 · answered by cliff 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
There are mental conditions that Bush has and they serious. Delusional, is just one of his disorders.
As for his speeches: He has a team that decides what needs to be in the speech, several writers, and then a speaking coach walk him through it. Don't believe it then you need to get on the web and check out the different dept. the White House has and what they do.
Most all of those in any form of government has a team like that.
As another stated-these people have had wars going on for years.
Oh! He'll be remembered all right but not in the way you feel.
A great liar who had the power to send our men and women into a war based on falsehoods that he created.
Most people now see what Bush has done and anyone who takes over the presidency will have a huge mess to clean up.
So in answer to your question: NO! I DO NOT AGREE.
2007-01-27 22:27:52 · answer #5 · answered by dragon 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Are you for real????
Driven....yes and all the time the money he and his family are making from their shares in oil supplies tho the US military , plus the many ties they have to Saudi Interests will mke him sorely miissed.
Middle East become Libralised after centuries of upheaval from a man who reads a childrens story book upside down.. The man is a buffoon and a fool and if you think him a hero then all i feel for you is a deep sadness.
Terrorists defeated...what is a terrorist? define a terrorist? is it someone who defends his homeland against an invading army??or is it the boggy man devised by a presidents media spin doctor to keep America in fear, fear is a strong weapon. All sorts of crimes can be committed when the government keeps its people in fear.
I wont miss Bush one single bit , and when the time comes and he is given a state Funeral I will be there ....to pisss on his grave
2007-01-27 21:19:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
LMAO on this one - Terrorists defeated? Middle East Liberalized? Bush an oracle?
Put the bong down dude.
This leadership will not be missed one bit.
Sure, it was Carter's fault, or Bill Clinton's fault for initially funding and emboldening terrorists but ultimately, Bush will go down as the President who took a baseball bat to the bee hive - and got stung by it.
2007-01-27 21:12:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Yes, I agree. Sadly people wont realize this and truly believe that until it is too late. When we are attacked again after the Democrats take over the White House (God forbid), and start to ruin this country and not take terrorism seriously, then more people will miss George Bush and others like him who actually see this terror threat. The threat is real like it or not. Trying to live in denial and act like it doesnt exist is a deadly mistake and just stupid. Why did 9/11 happen? Perhaps because the democrat, Clinton, did not take the threat seriously and did not take out Bin Laden when we had the chance. It is documented that we had him in our sights and the white house was asked if we could take him out, Clinton and his crew backed out. Bush is the scape goat and wrongly so. Down with liberals!!!!
2007-01-27 22:47:48 · answer #8 · answered by Bucfan 2 · 2⤊ 5⤋
He has been a blundering and incompetent leader. The intelligence was there showing that we could not possible win the war in Iraq with the troop levels put in by Bush and his idiot administration. I genuinely believe Bush will be remembered as one of the worst presidents in US history.
2007-01-27 22:10:07 · answer #9 · answered by Cracker 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Well it doesn't take a genius or an oracle to know that no matter when we leave there's going to be a growth in crime and terrorism. Bushes blind 'leadership' is not a show of strength. It is stubbornness to make sure he doesn't look the like the jack a** he is when he leaves office. There are other solutions to this problem, killing and terrorizing THEM isn't the best way to go either.
GOOD RIDDANCE.
2007-01-27 21:05:38 · answer #10 · answered by Lynnix 3 · 5⤊ 5⤋