2007-01-27 20:21:23 · 6 answers · asked by vbv 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
As Pluto was unknown before 1930, what was Scorpio's planet before then? How did astrologers manage without Neptune before 1846? Or before 1690 without Uranus? As Pluto was obviously very important astrologically, what about its fellow dwarf planets Ceres, Eris, Sedna, Quaoar and others? Or don't they count?
2007-01-27 22:39:21 · answer #1 · answered by tentofield 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Crow. Astrology doesn't consider scientific information at all.
Consider that the sun has moved west one zodiac constellation since the zodiac signs were designated 2000 years ago (due to precession of the equinoxes) and no astrologer has ever taken that into consideration.
2007-01-28 14:10:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Astrology is fake anyways so it doesnt matter! Stars in space dont really form any shapes. it just looks that way from earth.
2007-01-27 23:20:54 · answer #3 · answered by NEOH 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will always be Pluto. Astrology does not follow the whims of scientists.
2007-01-27 20:28:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Now Scorpios are considered stars. I'm a scorpio, and I consider myself a star anyhow.
2007-01-27 20:26:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pick one, it won't make any difference.
2007-01-27 20:29:29 · answer #6 · answered by Labsci 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋