being smart enough to have the answers but not being strong enough to see it through
or being stupid enough to not realise what's going on.
2007-01-27 19:49:41 · 8 answers · asked by natalia 4 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Smart enough, at least then you can pass your wisdom onto others and help them develop into people with less mistakes through life and help them get through even if you could never get far in your own life.
2007-01-27 20:32:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the guy was really smart, surely he'd have the logic to out-weigh the need to impart that knowledge over the lack of strength he has.
Plus, for the guy, being stupid is the best - ignorance is bliss.
Luce xxxx
2007-01-28 04:35:13 · answer #2 · answered by Luchia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first one would be worse to me because if your stupid enough to not realise whats going on then im sure you could care less about the whole situation
2007-01-28 03:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by Max 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
being stupid is worse i think. though both things are rather bad..
2007-01-28 04:10:37 · answer #4 · answered by Top_secret 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first choice.
2007-01-28 03:56:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You taken too much sugar in your diet dude..
2007-01-28 03:53:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
all of the above
2007-01-28 04:10:50 · answer #7 · answered by iroc 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I need to think on that. O-O
2007-01-28 03:54:41 · answer #8 · answered by elliebear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋