To all you ladies out there if you had been married at a very young age because you were pregnant and the man you married was a little under size and you had been with a few guy that was alot bigger than the man she married would she every have the need for or want for the bigger size would she alway feel like she missing a little somethig in her sex life
2007-01-27 18:23:24 · 24 answers · asked by SSR 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
nope
2007-01-27 18:28:09 · answer #1 · answered by rudyspuddin 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well you need to keep in mind that she did marry you, so I would say no, but if you really think it is a problem theres all kinds of fun toys you can buy & have fun together with. I am pretty sure she did not marry you just cause she was pregnant but because she loved you. Size is not the most important think with sex ~ you need to remember that and also you should just be very open with your sex life with your wife and voice your concerns with her ~ good communication goes a long way when there is any problems and if there arent problems goes a long way to avoid them.
2007-01-27 18:31:02 · answer #2 · answered by teresawol 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I can't say size matters, but some positions can enhance the experience a little more depending on the size, there are sexual enhancements, and toys. Plus, a womans vagina can stretch and tighten as needed. If she's stimulated then you shouldn't have anything to worry about, also with having a smaller penis she may be willing to try anal sex.
2007-01-27 18:40:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most definitely, Especially since she married because she was pregnant. That is the wrong reason to get married as well as being very young. If she's had bigger then that is probably her preference, but she probably loves you! Love can conquer all. Good Luck!
2007-01-27 19:00:20 · answer #4 · answered by marincaligirl 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well if your husband can still perform correctly in other ways, try to improvise. If not, then pray on it. My husband's **** was the same length and width as a stick of butter, but he made up for it doing other things in the bedroom. Bigger doesn't always mean better. I have encountered men who were well endowed and couldn't do squat.
2007-01-27 18:36:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes and no. I've been with a few (smaller) guys before my current (large) boyfriend. Before, I didn't have good sex, but I was in love and it really didn't matter about the sex. I didn't care one way or the other. If they had been bigger I still would've loved them just as much. I love my current boyfriend and we have great sex and I would still love him just as much if he were smaller. So it matters if you want great sex (sometimes) but if you are in love it doesn't matter.
2007-01-28 01:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by while_love_remains 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's not the size, it's not the money, it's not the romance, and it's not the look that matter. it's all depend on how ugly, selfish, coward, dishonest you are that matter to women. women today simply love jerks
2007-01-27 22:59:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If she's blown out, she's gonna notice the difference! j/k
I thought many women prefer clitoral stimulation more than sexual intercourse? If that's the case then why does size matter? Shouldn't tongue push-ups matter instead?
2007-01-27 18:42:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only if you're not good at sex. It doesn't matter if you're small as long as you know what you're doing. Women's nerve endings are within the first 2 inches of her vagina.
2007-01-27 18:28:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, yeah, size does matter. It feels nice to be all filled up. But there are ways around it, I'm sure. My advice would be to get really good at lickin' clit.
2007-01-27 18:56:04 · answer #10 · answered by nunca 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Even if my husband was not as well endowed as some past relationships - it wouldn't matter because he is the person I love - and love is "blind".
2007-01-27 18:30:53 · answer #11 · answered by karespromise 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋