English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Look over 75 Scientists say 911 was an inside job:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=403757&in_page_id=1770

Are you smarter then them? Oh let me guess your post a link to unpopular mechincs saying what some dude jim megis who happens to be cousins with the commender of the dept of homeland security

Did you know thermite cut the Support Pillars?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wVLeKwSkXA

There in the video is the DOCTOR of Physics.

And did you know WTC- 7 collpased?? Did you know 25% Of americand didnt even know this building came down b/c of the media black out?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329&q=Larry+silverstein


And What about the thousands of Victims Family members who believe this is an inside job?

http://www.911blogger.com/node/3112

There is just a few of the hundreds of peices of evidences against the U.S. Government. I could make a video for over 10 hours on all the evidence.

2007-01-27 17:27:59 · 25 answers · asked by Alert 1 in Politics & Government Government

25 answers

most of them are asking to reopen the investigation, not claiming it was an inside job. that's alex jones.

the aluminum probably came from the plane or the facade of the buildings, the iron from the superstructure, and the sulphur from god knows what kind of office equipment.

2007-01-27 17:32:35 · answer #1 · answered by uncle osbert 4 · 3 2

1) If you wrote in something that resembled normal English, people might take you more seriously.
2) Daily Mail? What's next? National Enquirer?
3) Physics profs aren't likely to know much about the collapse of the towers. It's an engineering problem. Only 1 of these alledged 75 "experts" was identified by name.
4) There was no media blackout on WTC 7. I heard about it that day.
5) Youtube, google videos & a blog are not credible sources.
6) The heat from 2 large plane's full of jet fuel burning could easily weaken the structure enough for the buildings to fall. Had Thermite been used, they would have dropped much faster.
7) You seem tobe claiming expertise in this area. What are YOUR credentials?

2007-01-27 17:50:03 · answer #2 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 1

This is all fluff to cover up the previous administration knew about Operation Bojinka, or else Sandy Berger wouldn't have been in the national archives shoving documents in his pants to prevent the 9/11 commission from finding them. The building fell because of teh air spaces above the ceilings for all the old coaxial cables, the removal of fireproofing material over the years, and the heat caused by the plane fuel. Did they fake the video of Bin Laden watching it on tv and bragging he knew it would work? It was a terrible act, against innocent people who were "giving peace a chance" by a culture that hates the Western world and Western values and freedoms, that could have been prevented. It's why Reagan started the air marshal program, which a lobbyist for the airline industry (Mrs. Tom Daschle to be exact) got congress to eliminate due to the financial burden on the airlines. A careful review of facts will show this plot was being hatched while Clinton was schmoozing the Arab world and hugging Yasser Arafat, and 9/11 occurred BEFORE we invaded Iraq. If you want a conspiracy take a good look at TWA 800, and the mysterious dead ends in the Oklahoma City bombing and first WTC bombing that should have proved Al Q was a serious threat that needed to be dealt with, and not by launching missiles at Bin Laden's camp hours after you got everyone's permission in the Middle East.

2007-01-27 17:43:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

The Blogbaba knows what he saw on TV and on line, the hole in the Pentagon didn't look like a plane crash site and I am not ever close to an expert on the subject. Those planes seemed to hit those buildings from the outside not the inside, and I did buy a coffee cup from the Sands before they demolished it in Vegas, so I noticed the way those building fell, but I really don't know enough about stuff like that to comment intelligently.

I don't post many links, in fact I just starting blogging for laughs about a week or two ago, I'm barely computer literate. If I wanted to be an investigative reporter, I would have checked out how many businesses in the twin towers were on the verge of bankruptcy, and treated it like any other insurance scam/torch job. But I'm not in law enforcement. My heart bleeds for those who died, and I admit I wanted W. to swat the perps, I just don't think Saddam was the guy.

If Chaney was a major stock holder or former CEO of a bunch of corporations who were failing finacially on Sept. 10th out of the twin towers, I wouldn't tell anyone. Look what the V.P. did to that lawyer guy he went hunting with, do you think he would cut the Blogbaba any slack. I don't know who got scared more Wolf Blitzer or us out here in TV land, but Chaney made his point. You cannot reason with unreasonable people, and you can make George W. look like a moron all you want, but Chaney is real. As in real real dangerous.

You want smart, lock Einstein in a cage with a gorilla and toss in a banana. I don't care how smart Al was, the gorilla's getting the banana.

2007-01-27 17:59:35 · answer #4 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 1 1

grow up it wasn't an inside job. stop just trying to create controversy. There may be 75 scientists that think it was an inside job but there are hundreds of thousands that know it wasn't. You say that there are hundreds of pieces of evidence say it was our government but the FBI found over a million tips that it was bin laden. So what if some "experts" think 911 was an inside job. Millions of other experts know it wasn't. Not everything you find on the internet is true, you should know that by now. What you are saying right now is terrible. Over 2000 Americans died and you are using that event as an opportunity to criticize our government. That is just sick.

2007-01-27 17:41:53 · answer #5 · answered by THEBurgerKing 4 · 3 1

OMG...i had a long long answer to this with soooo much research and it didn't get posted, or gor deleted or something...oh well....watch terrorstorm people, and research the Gulf of Tonkin Incident because that was made publicly known that it was a lie just to start the Vietnam War.
Read the Pentagon Papers

2007-01-28 16:54:31 · answer #6 · answered by Princess 3 · 0 0

Okay - I looked at the things you posted. There is still not concrete proof. There are just as many scientists who have punched holes in the reasoning of the scientists you say can show that it was an inside job. Are you ignoring their opinions just because you want to believe that it was an inside job?

2007-01-27 22:46:51 · answer #7 · answered by 63vette 7 · 1 0

Here's my conspiracy theory:

I believe that an evil, dark force (probably the NEOCONS!) is engaging in a global conspiracy to weaken America's culture and make us vulnerable to the coming takeover of the government by HALLIBURTON and DICK CHENEY!

Their plan? It's simple. They've infiltrated our country with 9/11 conspiracy theorists who will make us all very afraid, distracted and vulnerable.

Just when we're all lathered up about George Bush blowing up the WTC's, THEY WILL STRIKE!!!

Oh God, I feel so weak and frightened! Maybe Hillary will save us?!!!

2007-01-28 13:57:03 · answer #8 · answered by idlebud 5 · 0 0

I do not think it was an inside job. i am a bit skeptic that the evidence claim that it was. I believe the CIA that once trained Osma bin laden. all the missile and fire power over the years from the Iran and Iraq war was once US military firepower. if we watch and read newspapers and read the fine line. we may then might know the truth

2007-01-27 17:44:02 · answer #9 · answered by Elvis 109 3 · 1 1

I've heard conjectures that the Israelis paid off the Saudis to do it and George was in cohoots with them.

You must admit that 9/11 made Georgie's presidency - he benefitted the most in many many areas.

Without 9/11 the country would have realized what a huge dud he is much much sooner.

2007-01-27 17:40:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No experts have said any such thing--being popular on conspiracy websites populated with people who are delusional does not make one an expert.

And yes--I've seen their "arguements" And yes, I do know more than they do--because I have a basic knowledge of physics, while obvously none of these "experts" could pass a high school course in the subject.

2007-01-27 18:48:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers