English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am just wondering if a girl has to choose would she choose a lot of hair on the man's legs or non and i want the answer to be one of these two i don't want anybody to say just a little bit of hair?

2007-01-27 16:09:05 · 16 answers · asked by KILLER 1 in Beauty & Style Other - Beauty & Style

16 answers

I would prefer hair. That to me is more manly.

2007-01-27 16:13:23 · answer #1 · answered by MoMoney23 5 · 0 0

Who'd want a boyfriend with shaved legs! Ewwwwwwww! Hair is good! Hairy chests and legs are good... backs and upper arms are not so good.

Overall, I would go with the all natural look and feel.

2007-01-27 16:14:10 · answer #2 · answered by madjennyvane 3 · 0 0

It doesn't really matter, it depends on the girl. But if the guy shaves his legs, chances are he is gay.

It's like a stereotype. Maybe a series of stereotypes.
All girls like hot men.
Hot men are usually buff.
Buff men don't shave their legs and they are rugged men.

This is not true, or proven true. Of course, many gay guys can shave and still look hot to someone, and gay guys can work out and be buff too. But it's just a stereotype like "all blondes are dumb."

Do what you want though. ;)

2007-01-27 16:31:34 · answer #3 · answered by T.VO 3 · 0 1

WOW .. this question can go both ways for people, depending on their opinion, but um me personally would want a guy with no hair, i have a bad experience with a guy with really hairy legs, he was rubbing his legs on me trying to be all seductive and what not. and it did not fell god at all.

2007-01-27 16:14:39 · answer #4 · answered by Miss MORSE 1 · 0 0

A lot. I want my man to be manly! I was never into these metrosexual guys... I mean, I don't want a slob, but neither do I want a primping, prissy man! Bring back Real Men, and yes that includes hairy legs!

2007-01-27 16:14:43 · answer #5 · answered by Rissa 2 · 1 1

I don't really like a lot of hair but if the guy has a good personality I am not going to be like ewwwww you have hair. lol

2007-01-27 16:20:02 · answer #6 · answered by blackglitter 2 · 0 0

a lot of hair on his legs no hair is just weird

2007-01-27 16:17:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hm. That's a tough one. Either way it's weird, but I would have to go with a lot of hair. No hair seems... too girly? I don't know.

2007-01-27 16:13:26 · answer #8 · answered by Meghan 2 · 0 0

Hair..i guess. Everybody has hair natually. Girls shave there, so i expect my guy to have some.

2007-01-27 16:12:51 · answer #9 · answered by ME!! 2 · 0 0

i guess if those were my only choices, i'd choose hairless. i'd assume that i could convince him to go to the pool twice a year, and just tell myself that he was a swimmer. but, i don't know how i would rationalize that i was sleeping with a sasquatch.

2007-01-27 16:25:10 · answer #10 · answered by hunting wabbit 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers