Should they have more economic responsibility to their nation since they have more to give?
Should they be allowed to use their money to influence politics?
Should they receive extra tax breaks as incentive to get richer?
Should they have responsibilities to the poor?
What about to their workers?
2007-01-27 15:01:01 · 4 answers · asked by Eleazar's Daughter 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
If the riches man in the world and 2nd richest man in the world are giving away 85% of there wealth to people and groups and overseeing tis charter to do right before they die, should be an example to all rich people!!
Many only give for a tax break!!
Many think they should leave it to relatives.
Make a difference do good with your money regardless how much you have, Wont do you a damn bit good dead!!
No Substitution for Kindness!!
One good act seen, is one that may be followed!!
2007-01-27 15:09:22 · answer #1 · answered by gipster1966 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither more nor less than anyone else in society. All benefit from the existence of the society, but the rich don't benefit more than anyone else. (Some will challenge this latter, but think about it.)
2007-01-27 15:07:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you're opening a real can of worms here.
No to all of your questions. Many of them are rich because of hard work (not all but many) and should not be penalized for their efforts.
2007-01-27 15:10:30 · answer #3 · answered by Beachman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they should have the decency to at least feel guilty spending $2,000 on a shower curtain when there are people starving in their country
2007-01-27 15:11:30 · answer #4 · answered by martinmagini 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋