I think so...dont get me wrong ..I like them I just dont understand why some people want to put U2 on the same level of say the Beatles or the Stones or Queen when frankly they are very good but even Oasis has better songs and i can mention at least another 10 bands better than U2
What do you think?
2007-01-27
14:32:27
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Rocknroller
2
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Music
The guys who put down Oasis really dont know what you are talking about...here we have the facts:
1.-Who sells more? No doubt U2 but the fact that you sell more doesnt mean you are any better...just look at Britney Spears or the Back Street Boys...besides you cant really compare as U2´s first album was released in 1980 and Oasis first album was released until 1994....
2.-For over 30 years a poll was made by the BBC a simple question: Who is the greatest british band of all time?..for over 30 years the answer was "The Beatles" even in 1994 25 years after their break up..in 1996 however the same question was made and it had a different answer now: it was OASIS...I am a fan of both bands and I find this such an exageration (and i am defending Oasis dont forget that) but this tells us the impact that Oasis made on the music scene...
2007-01-29
10:15:16 ·
update #1
3.-On the November 2006 issue of Q Magazine, celebrating the magazine's 20th anniversary, U2 frontman Bono recognized "Live Forever" as one of six songs that he wished he had written from the last 20 years of music. if you dont believe see by yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Forever
3.-They won him acclaim from critics and peers, such as Sir George Martin, producer for The Beatles, who stated "I consider Noel Gallagher to be the finest songwriter of his generation"...i mean this man is 82 years old and more than 50 as producer..if someone knows about music is him..again dont believe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noel_Gallagher
4.- Peolple who say they only have 2 good songs..I laugh i can only say you dont know their catalogue: i mean really if you dont know it you dont know what you have been missing:Live Forever,Rock and Roll Star,Whatever,Talk Tonight,The Masterplan,Half the World away,Slide Away...and many many more which are much more better than anything by U2
2007-01-29
10:24:07 ·
update #2
5.-The fact that you win a Grammy doesnt tell anything...The Beatles is better than any other group and they won only one (as a group) because at the time their music was considered very agressive and weird...c´mon I cant believe that you defend awards
6.-As a vocalist Liam Gallagher is much more original than Bono..Bono sings OK but his voice sounds as many others and Liam is instantaneously recognizable
7.-On 27 August 2006, Live Forever was named the Greatest Song of all time in music history, in a poll released by Q Magazine...
8.- I saw U2 9 years ago and I saw Oasis 3 times already and let me tell you that I prefer Oasis 100% more ...Oasis is all about music U2 is about showmanship....in that yeah U2 is better than U2
3.-Definetly Maybe (Oasis first album) has been elected as one of the best 10 albums in Rock History by sand the 2nd in the 90´s (just behind Nirvana´s Nevermind)..U2 has made great records but none of them so good to be considered one of the best in history.
2007-01-29
10:35:58 ·
update #3
and last but not least certainly...OASIS DEFINED A GENERATION...just like Elvis in the 50´s,The Beatles in the 60´s ...Oasis defined a post-grunge 90´s generation..you cannot say the same about U2........one recommendation PLEASE LISTEN TO THE OASIS CATALOGUE!!!!!!! you´ll find the answer there
2007-01-29
10:39:11 ·
update #4