2007-01-27 13:32:06 · 19 answers · asked by John16 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Thatcher would not battle an unarmed woman.
2007-01-27 14:00:42 · answer #1 · answered by lucyp1958 2 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Margret Thatcher would be spinning in her grave with good cause to see you use her and Clinton in the same sentence!! They are as opposite in every way as day and night, Clinton a total idiot compared to Margret Thatcher. No country messed with her!
2007-01-27 15:10:34 · answer #2 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Both are ruthless and cold, but I give the Thachter the upperhand since she match verbal abuse to the level of Chavez at times. Still, Hillary in the whitehouse wont be pretty because she is smart in the sense she doesnt take to poison pill bills. Never the less, the republicans keep trying to preverted leglisation to allow the tar to stick to her easier. Both maniuplative with words, so its tie the verbal harshness of both speaking styles. Hillary, comes out on top in maniuplation to make sure to not take the poison pill bills, but Thacher is ruthless too by getting the unions out of the job behind thier backs doing it before the workers arrived. I hope she dont win because she has the canny ability to get legislation thru make some libertarians, republicans puke.
2007-01-27 14:37:06 · answer #3 · answered by ram456456 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Margaret Thatcher. By so much, it's silly.
2007-01-27 13:36:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Margaret, even after her stroke.
However, being a lady, she would decline to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
2007-01-27 15:05:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO CONTEST- Thatcher would run circles around hillary dillary
2007-01-27 14:22:14 · answer #6 · answered by Sailon 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Thatcher with her advanced age, several strokes and completely on her British Butt drunk would vaporize Clinton no matter how many Lifelines Regis Philbin gave her.
2007-01-27 14:16:36 · answer #7 · answered by John 16 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
why do i help the less than dogs hillary clinton i might want to wish to win yet once you seem at sorry cant say her call music list of all her fights contained in the united kingdom she might want to win . the in user-friendly words one she lost and end her career become my her own authorities
2016-12-03 03:22:49 · answer #8 · answered by santella 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Margaret Thatcher was the start of all this Neo Con B/S and was evil incarnate, a destroyer of lives and communities. Myself and family lived through the absolute worst of her Nazi, Fascist excesses.
Thank God we escaped and now live in Australia. John Howard is trying to take us down the same road as Bush and Thatcher and along with Blair are the trilogy of the Anti-Christ as far as I'm concerned.
Hillary Clinton as a democrat and a women will break the cycle of war mongering, confrontationalist, American foreign policy and that has to be good for the World.
American intransigence and foreign policy is responsible for much of the misery and terrorism around the World and constitutes the greatest threat to World peace and stability in my opinion.
Jules, Australia.
2007-01-27 13:49:36 · answer #9 · answered by Jules G 6 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Margaret hands down.
2007-01-27 13:35:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋