and why American troops control can not it anymore?
2007-01-27 12:52:05 · 11 answers · asked by shadab a 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
sorry Can not control it any more
2007-01-27 12:53:07 · update #1
This seems a lot like the situation in Yugoslavia / Serbia / Croatia where the conflicts were oppressed by an oppressive government. The Sunnis and Shiites were not in conflict physically due to the rule of Sadam who maintained the area through force and psychological means.
American troops are not able to control it because the violence is promoted from outsiders such as Iran and Syria who provide weapons, money, and support to the extreme members of the parties. Along with that we get practically no support from our supposed allies for maintaining balance and peace. Countries like Russia, Germany, and France have financial interests in the region which keeps them from supporting us and are likely supporting the other side to some extent.
2007-01-27 13:09:33 · answer #1 · answered by Poncho Rio 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
few data for the unknown -the 1980-1988 Iraq-Iran conflict became no longer a Sunni-Shiite conflict, if it were then the sixty 5% Shiite inhabitants of Iraq don't have fought interior the first position -The west did not take a seat and watch, the west did make a contribution in the back of the curtains for particular, promote guns to kill one yet another so as that the winner ought to easily be as weak as attainable. -Al-Qaeda did not take administration in Iran. the U. S. allowed the insurgents to make Iraq because the battling grounds for them. Al-Qaeda under no circumstances existed in Iraq until eventually after the U. S. invasion. A democratically elected authorities wiping the Sunnis (about 30%) of Iraqis ?! isn't that why US invaded Iraq for interior the first position, because Saddam tried to attempt this manner of act adverse to the individuals? some double criteria for particular. those are people you're speaking about no longer toys to wipe/unwipe. again, why did the U. S. come to Iraq once more desirable extremely?...
2016-10-16 04:55:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Shiites had very little power under Saddam. The Kurds were being slaughtered. The world made a fuss over Bosnia,but didn't give a damn about the Kurds being cleansed. Perhaps because it's un pc in the media's eyes to verbally attack muslims killing muslims.
2007-01-27 13:18:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because both sides were not allowed to fight each other. Sadam Hussain's army prevented it. Now there is no more army in charge, so we have a big mess. Reason why? The people of Iraq felt that we invaded their country. Of which we did. The people of Iraq want us out of their country. Of which we ignore.
If Iraq had no oil, we would never have been there.
2007-01-27 13:00:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sunnis had all the guns tanks and power under Saddam.
To the lady talking about the Kurds. The Kurds are Christian and you can not talk about muslums killing Christians.
2007-01-27 14:16:28 · answer #5 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Team America says so!
2007-02-04 06:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by Gotta Lotta Nerve 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No sectarian strife??? What do you think the Iran/Iraq war was?
2007-01-27 14:05:14 · answer #7 · answered by Shhawnconnery 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sunnis and Shiites have been fighting each other since Mo-Ham-Ed died my friend, read your history
2007-01-27 14:10:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because Americans won't blast the Iraqis with poison gas like Saddam did.
2007-01-27 13:46:52 · answer #9 · answered by lifeisagift 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in
2007-01-27 13:13:18 · answer #10 · answered by Diogenes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋