I would vote for Hillary. Men have done enough running the world!
2007-01-27 11:24:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by frenchie 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
Bill Clinton was a good president even with his office slut screwin. There were plenty of jobs and no war, when duesch bag Bush came to office every thing fell apart. If I could bring myself to think that Bill would have a great amount of say in what Hillary does as president I might consider it. Im most worried about jobs and wages for non college persons and which president would give a care about those people. Duesch bag Bush dosnt.
2007-01-27 11:35:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by TailGunner420 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a slight chance that I might vote for her. I'm an independent. The Republicans and Democrats are at war with each other. I'm just going to sit back and pay attention to who is say what and why they are running for president. It all depends who is able to run for each party and what they will do as president...how well they will be believed and recieved in that position. If I don't like them, then I'm voting for the independent candidate.
2007-01-27 11:30:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some here say they will and others say might and the majority say no but the best answer here is the one that says will not vote for that bag. I personally feel that just calling mrs clin-tOOn a bag is letting her off too easy. She put a gun to a man's head (in the white house mind you) pulled the trigger and had it declared suicide to get herself out of her white water mess. Gross - sick woman. As long as it is debatable that there is the tiniest bit of truth in this no one could morally bring any reason to vote for this thing.
2007-01-27 11:32:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not in a million years! She's out there puttin' on a face and trying to deceive the prospective voters into believing she's something she's not. If she gets in office, we'll all see the true Hillary, and believe me, it won't be pretty. By the way - if you plan to vote for her, you should atleast learn to spell her name right.
2007-01-27 11:29:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary today admited that she was part responsible for authorizing Bush to go ahead. So now what? She said he misled her. Is this who we want in the Presidency, someone who is too bent on getting elected to check out facts? She is willing to help sacrifice lives so that she can look good.
I don't think this is what we want. Of course we have 1 and 1/2 years to go before the nomination so who knows, maybe she will self-destruct by then.
2007-01-27 11:26:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jimfix 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a New Yorker who thinks that John Edwards and Obama should run on the same ticket. WOW!!! That would be wonderful. Edwards for president and Obama has his running mate. They are both first class Americans with good values. As for Hillary, I would lhave liked her much better if she had dumped her husband.
2007-01-27 11:35:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Di Ko 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will! Because she is the most qualified of all are and will be running. Do not forget that she has knowledge of the workings of the government being a politician most of her life, and a first lady for 8 years.
2007-01-27 11:31:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by furrryyy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no...because people will know that Hilary Clinton can't possibly win. the men will be too biased
and the women will be too doubtful
about having a female leader
2007-01-27 11:25:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kelzoo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Bill Clinton is going to vote for Republicans out of spite.
2007-01-27 11:25:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not me. The USA needs protectors of their secret weapons and not the Clintons giving China every advantage over us.
2007-01-27 11:26:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Jeancommunicates 7
·
0⤊
0⤋