It's hard to tell anymore. Who killed John F. Kennedy? Was it a conspiracy or was it not? Did Lee Harvey Oswald act alone or was others involved? I'm confused. There's so much crap out there. I can't tell what's fact and what's fiction. Things are so screwed up. If Oswald acted alone, why is there still a lot of debate 40+ years after Kennedy was killed?
I've seen the famous "Zapruder Film" thousands of times. President Kennedy was hit twice.
2007-01-27 10:57:21 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
I think you are not the only one who is confused. I think that anyone who still believes that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone does not question the events or evidence. Why would the American government classify the information regarding JFK's death, and not release it until 50 years later?
If it was only Oswald who acted, why not release all the information now? I think whoever wanted to see JFK dead also helped in the planning and execution, and was quite happy to see Oswald take the full blame.
2007-01-27 12:41:01 · answer #1 · answered by WMD 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a question that, for some people, will never be resolved. I believe that Oswald was the killer and that he acted alone. Author Gerald Posner wrote a book several years ago that very effectively debunked all or most of the then-popular theories. I mention Posner specifically because he began the book thinking he could prove that Oswald was either not the killer or that he did not act alone, but wound up coming down on the side of the people who believe it was Oswald and no one else.
2007-01-27 11:30:27 · answer #2 · answered by Kath 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋