Yes or No: Was there a connection between Iraq and the attack of 9/11?

Question

If you answer NO: Did the Bush admin ever say that there WAS A CONNECTION between Iraq and 9/11?

If you answer YES: Did the Bush admin ever state that there IS NO EVIDENCE of a connection between Iraq and 9/11?

Answer 1

No the attackers were Saudis, Jordanians, and Pakistanis.

Answer 2

Not a chance on God's green Earth.
I don't remember the Bush admin. ever say there was a connection between Iraq and 9/11, in fact I DO vividly remember seeing a video byte of the President within a year of 9/11 saying "We have no connection between Iraq and 9/11."

And I agree with John R, check out http://www.infowars.com/

Answer 3

Yes. the 9/11 commission found that there was ground that Saddam was informed about 9/11, but not active in planning it. And 3 of the 19 hijackers were in Iraq in the years leading up to 9/11, one for medical care from saddam

Answer 4

Bush never mentioned Iraq and 911 in the same sentence as far as I can remember. But it is a well know fact that terrorists training camps were in northern Iraq before 9 11 for quite sometime. Even though Saddam and Osama had their differences there were records found after we defeated Saddam that the two had meeting in bagdad before 911. so it's any
ones guess. Why the question anyway? we are in Iraq and we need to win this war on terror to preserve individual freedom over living under brutal dicatorship right?

Answer 5

no and no...

there is some evidence that al-queda may have met with Saddam at some point... but there is also evidence that says apparently those talks didn't go so well... and in fact... before we invaded, Saddam seemed to think that al-zarqawi was quite a threat to him and his government and was actually trying to kill him...

I think Osama even called saddam some names... since he wasn't quite as much of a "religious extremist" as he would like and in fact more secular on the whole...

and Bush seemed pretty much smart enough to never say they were connected... even though they were often mentioned in the same sentence... no direct connections... many seem to have "read between the lines" even if there was nothing to read though...

Answer 6

even as Al Quadea genuinely might want to pick to mount yet another 9/11 type attack interior of us of a, they look to imagine that attacks interior of Iraq are a more effective effectual use of their battered substances. by using chaos, political instability and shortage of ability to guard its borders, Iraq is a danger to hit more straightforward objectives and nevertheless get ends up of their choose. by using open border, recruits from around the globe are in a position to sneak in by potential of Iran or Syria, while entering into the u . s . is now a lot more durable. by using tremendous variety of yank infantrymen who're putting themselves into danger, the terrorists are in a position to inflict even more effective unfavourable casualties than a threat interior the u . s .; even as a civilian casualty is genuinely tragic, the demise of a experienced soldier represents the shortcoming of tens of millions of money well worth of educating, expertise and adventure, no longer to point the drain this is been putting on recruiting. by potential of attacking Iraq, whom the u . s . has placed all of its credibility into, they're hoping to exhibit honest-climate friends interior the secular Muslim international that the u . s . might want to be properly-intentioned yet no longer sturdy; the projected photo might want to be that Al Quaeda domination is the lesser evil than American domination. by potential of unfavourable u . s .'s photo to the international, this brings on very a lot of frustration to the President and his supporters, who (as all of us do even as annoyed) has a tendency to say issues to friends like France and Mexico that he does no longer regularly say, causing friction the position there might want to be none. for this reason there have been many more effective attacks outdoors of the u . s . than interior (Malaysia, Kenya, Tanzania, Indian Ocean, Yemen, London, Spain, etc). the u . s . will be a target again in uncomplicated words even as they experience they have an threat for optimum harm.

Answer 7

Here is evidence for all of your questions in one shot. Take a look:

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/21/bush-on-911/

Answer 8

NO.
NO and I like the viedo because Bush stated adminstration said there was a connection.

What is clear that Iraq was supporting terrorism.

Answer 9

No connection. George W went into Iraq to finish what his father didn't.
Still waiting for the WMD's to be found.

Answer 10

No. Iraq was not about 9/11. There was not a direct correlation.

Iraq was about disarming a dictator with WMD who threatened to use them against the US and our allies.

However, just like the Senate who sent the troops to Iraq are now changing their minds, the war is now a battleground against terrorists, both fundamental and state sponsored.

Answer 11

You can't argue with that video; if your answer is yes then you haven't watched the video. Watch and learn. Definately no. Bin laden was despised by Hussain for being a 'bad muslim' Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11 either; it was a total inside job