what does america think about beckham goin there? and visits from prince charles?

Question

is this britain trying to enforce its will on the americans? i hope it isnt because im pro american. i dont like their views an ideas amoungst the us people...who invited them there anyway?

Answer 1

I love Tony Blair, and as far as the "beckhams;"...there are people who like him and people who don't, it hasn't been scandalous over here. People will greet Prince Charles with grace, as always. Britain is one of our finest alies, and we for the most part love the Brit's over here...

Answer 2

I don't care on way or another if they are here or there. But I would have to say, rather than looking at it as Britain trying to enforce it's will on the Americans...which is a little ludicrous, I think....you should look at it as a positive. America is so great, even the Brits are defecting! As far as invitation goes, I think America has an open door policy, for the most part. As long as you enter our country legally and with good intentions. After all, isn't that the same way your ancestors got here?

Answer 3

it incredibly is an extremely thrilling article. i comprehend that Prince Charles has been very energetic and inventive in agriculture, organic and organic and different extra environmentally friendly farming ideas besides as having an pastime in climate substitute. extra those days I heard approximately his 18 month 'prediction' 21 months in the past right here, and now I desire i might have attended to that question and the responses a sprint extra carefully, i did no longer get all of the small print on that different than that he became predicting extra climate extremes, drought and etc. in line with danger he feels that the climate this year bears out his predictions and is turning out to be bolder, i do no longer understand. besides the shown fact that, i might question if 'alarmists' is rather an precise description of people who have faith in AGW yet merchandise to his characterization of capitalism and consumerism maximum proper us to worldwide financial and environmental give way in ninety six months. That sounds like a extraordinarily intense assertion to me, and without very important documentation i would not help it...surely he seems to be saying he 'jess ciphered it out in his HAID.' I concur together with his evaluation that unbridled consumerism and capitalism leads to chaos-that's why we've legislating and regulating bodies, and that i agree that we've been given ourselves into worry by utilising materialistic excesses, yet i do no longer see the place he's providing any kind of ideas, he's purely firing from the hip with those dire warnings of disaster. I mean...it means that we could restructure entire economies, existence and government-what the hell is he suggesting? What the (generally political) skeptics concern maximum? Draconian law, Totalitarianism, all of the stuff that the the skeptics have been warning us approximately? And all of this is going to happen in purely ninety six MONTHS except we do some thing now. inspite of his movie star, i will see the place people might prefer to distance themselves from this way of communicate. in line with danger he had a stroke or is bothered by early onset Alzheimer's. C'MON, Charley-get it mutually. enable's see some concrete proposals spelled out that individuals can evaluate independently of a few end-of-the-international subject in the past you're taking the rostrum with this way of speech lower back.

Answer 4

I could care less about Beckham or Prince Charles.
We're at WAR!!!

Answer 5

truthfully..i couldnt care less if theyre here or not

Answer 6

He is more welcome here than Hugo Chavez is.