Weapons have been found in Iraq. So why do demo's still deny this? Here's one source of many to check for yourselves.
http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2006/06/back-story.html
2007-01-27 09:52:00 · 10 answers · asked by jay r 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
To except that they exsist. They're giving Our President, the right to be at War with the Terriorists. And they can't have that. Good Question. Be there in November!
2007-01-27 10:03:32 · answer #1 · answered by Goggles 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.
Santorum's report refers to non-functioning pre-1991 chemical weapons that had already been dismissed by the White House’s own Iraq Survey Group. A Defense Department official has responded to Santorum’s claims, saying the weapons “are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war.”
2007-01-27 10:05:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
bush derangement syndrome?
seriously, Clinton sent military into Iraq himself back in 1998. he said the only way the world could be safe was for Saddam's reign to end. he also said the reason that there are other countries with WMD's that aren't such a big deal is that Saddam has USED WMD's and intentionally targeted civilians with them, INCLUDING HIS OWN PEOPLE. i got this from a speech at CNN.com.
i also just read an article in the New York Post, about the guy who was Saddam's second in command of the military. he says Saddam sent a lot of his weapons to SYRIA. he was saying that they MUST be found and returned to safe hands.
2007-01-27 10:03:53 · answer #3 · answered by political junkie 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We have over 130,000 service people in Iraq, if there are or were any WMDs in Iraq don't you think that the word would have gotten out? There are none there. Just because someone has a blog & calles himself a former spook(spy) dosen't make it so. If this person were truly a former spy & is giving out censored information, he is liable for treason. The Democrats are not hiding anything. We the people know where & who has WMDs It is & never has been Iraq & it has never been a secret.
2007-01-27 10:12:23 · answer #4 · answered by geegee 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes, WMD were found. They were old, and ineffective and of the same type and vintage as those used on the Kurds. Most importantly they still had the "made in USA' label on them!!
Now , does Dubyah want to admit to the world that his daddy gave Saddam WMD to use against the Kurds? To admit to the world that the things Saddam was being tried for, he did as a puppet to the US?
Ramble on a little more, please!
2007-01-27 10:27:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
They deny it because they just want to humiliate Bush, no matter what, even if they're wrong. But, I personally DO think there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the rest of the middle east, but not actual weapons: terrorists. They have the potential to kill many, many people which I believe makes them a weapon of mass destruction.
2007-01-27 09:57:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
guh... let's go through this yet again...
Bush said they were making weapons *post gulf war*... key phrase here... post gulf war...
...all the weapons that have been found are much older than that...
everyone knew they had them before that... duh... so that was never the issue...
now... think about it for a second...
why has Bush never come out and said "HEY, WE FOUND THEM... I WAS RIGHT!"
why?
because he knew that they weren't the same weapons...
this is exactly what the whole sanitorum incident was about, but you clearly don't remember...
he came out and did say "HEY, WE FOUND THEM!"...
then the white house and defense department went... "uh... those aren't the ones that we were talking about..."
and rick went on to lose... because he doesn't know what he's talking about...
2007-01-27 10:05:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
The only "weapons" found were from the 1970's, and about as dangerous as a bug bomb from Walmart.
2007-01-27 10:02:29 · answer #8 · answered by Vinegar Taster 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Not the type Bush calls weapons of Mass Destruction.None of these were ever found by any of the inspection parties in Iraq.
2007-01-27 09:56:55 · answer #9 · answered by WC 7 · 5⤊ 7⤋
They need to keep this lie up in order to continue to protest Bush and the war. There not interested in the truth, they will spin anything to make it look like they are right. Which is fitting for the left - obsessed with looking RIGHT all the time!
2007-01-27 09:57:26 · answer #10 · answered by Chester's Liver 2 · 3⤊ 9⤋