Ha. In some places, you don't need to take math to graduate, or science. Much less music or art.
Personally, I think we should fix the math and science problem first, but that's probably because I'm a scientist first and a musician second, not the other way around.
But it's not too late to learn an instrument if you want. I know adults who take piano, voice, and string instruments up when they're older. Heck, I started the violin at 23, and played with a symphony two years later. It's never too late.
2007-01-27 10:05:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by eri 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
No I do not think that Latino studies should be required. We are NOT a Latin American country. Instead, we need to be putting an emphasis on education and teaching our children skills that will get them far in life and help them compete against other developed nations. If Latinos want to learn about their heritage it's fine, but it's ridiculous to want to make it a requirement or even have it at schools. It's our tax payer money! We've all faced struggles in this nation, so quit making latinos sound like such victims. Like I stated earlier, our kids need to learn valuable skills, not some twisted history that emphasizes revolution.
2016-03-29 05:23:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because music is not a fundamental part of the educational process. Schools have decided that students NEED math, social studies, science, and english. If students WANT things like art, music, photography, or home ec. they can have it.
It's silly to resent the fact that you weren't forced to do something during your childhood. (If music classes had been a requirment, are you sure you would have enjoyed them?)
2007-01-27 09:39:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by DonSoze 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Can you imagine how expensive it would be to provide musical instruments for every child in every grade? It is simply not practical. The benefit from providing such a musical education would not be worth the cost because very few would be able to pursue a career in music. As such music courses are available in most schools as an elective for only those who seriously want to be there.
2007-01-27 09:33:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ape Ape Man 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
its not that it isnt a requriment, because you need at least .5 of a credit of art. the term art includes all art forms- drama, music, dance, painting, sculptures, ect. and most elementary and junior high schools require music wether it is chours, band, or just regular music class. i hope this helps
2007-01-27 10:13:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by iheartmnm123 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It would not be possible to make music a requirement.
2007-01-27 09:52:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by akaustav 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I truly believe that "specials" are overlooked, because they are not mandated as testing subjects, and as a result, underfunded and not required.
I'm right with you. In an ideal world, the "specials" would be tested and funded right along with math and reading!
2007-01-27 09:39:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
in most states it still is a requirement through hs...either band, orchestra or chorus...or you can opt out of performing and just take music app and theory classes..at least in NYC...
2007-01-27 10:23:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by techteach03 5
·
0⤊
1⤋