English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Oaklands passing offense went from 10th in the league to 31th without him. Why did they let him go?

2007-01-27 08:46:56 · 7 answers · asked by lilcurly 4 in Sports Football (American)

7 answers

Competent; Oakland was so bad he looked good; he's past his prime;Rich Gannon he's not.

2007-01-27 08:50:32 · answer #1 · answered by tesorotx 5 · 1 0

How good is Kerry Collins? Check out the record of the Titans for the first few games of the past season while he was playing. They were the jokes of the league until they replaced him.

2007-01-27 19:34:18 · answer #2 · answered by turkey 4 · 0 0

Dude he sucks. Don't claim it was HIM that pushed them down. Oakland had a crappy team that didn't care. That was HALF their problem. The other half was that as bad as he is they replaced him with the QB that is one of the few that is worst. Yeah Aaron Brooks. Now say that Collins was there last year. You know where there Pass Offense would have been? 30th, because the team would have still sucked and no one would have cared.

2007-01-27 17:56:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he just got older in terms of his physical abilities. i think the aveage NFL career is about 3-4 years.

2007-01-27 17:23:10 · answer #4 · answered by patriot07 5 · 0 0

collins sucks. he's past his prime

2007-01-27 20:57:22 · answer #5 · answered by patsrule 2 · 0 0

I agree with my source.

2007-01-27 18:08:50 · answer #6 · answered by Briiie.<3 4 · 0 0

idk. Collins is excellent, provided he has the time to throw (good protection), and doesn't get chased out of the pocket.

2007-01-27 16:50:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers