Not without a good reason.
2007-01-27 07:45:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by 63vette 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I can not believe how clueless these people are! The revolution would be over the Rule & control! Morons waking up to find out how they have none, & then wanting to do something about it! Congress has the most Rule & control they infact create the wealth control how much money gets printed & where the earmarks,seed money,blackbook spending & other hand outs go to! Never directly to the poor and trickle down economics does NOT work for the majority! So the Revolution would be class warfare! End Representative government replace it with majority rule & control by the legal citizens or a true democracy!
2007-01-27 08:30:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by bulabate 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were/are 100,000 PATRIOTIC AMERICANS out side the WHYte Howse Righ NOW Try CNN Headline News..or C-Span, of coarse Fox is playing it down...The MAJORITY of AMERICANS, are saying NO Occupation, No War, No INVASIONS, NO More WAR for PROFIT !! and many, many People now Know Bussche & Co. Are Members of The SKULL and BONES SOCIETY, which Is Directly Connected to The ILLUMINITI, which is tuchin p p's with The New World Order, who are associated with The Bohemian Grove, who during their yearly meet-up in No. Calif.(hannity-Bush-wouldn't be surprised if Bill,s willieWinkie was there.. I hate to tell ya folks these Elite bazzturdz dont give a squat 'bout YOU or This Country,, only their MegaWealth and POWER C-mon Y all STOP This Bickering and Name Calling ,, phucck all this argument about : which Party is better Like,WHO CARES ?.. Bussch Calls OUR CONSTITUTION "just a piece of PAPER !! HOW DARE HE ?? !! Lets STAND UNITED as AMERICANS !! Revolution is Immenent,, so Pray this LIBBY Trial opens the can with ALL These DIRTY WORMS .. ChanKnee will testify,.., Herr Karl Von RovenNazzi just today got Supoeoned(sp) These FREAKS need to Move from MY HOUSE !! Please all, Do YOUR OWN Study-Research,
2007-01-27 08:37:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the motive and method. I think an "ethics" revolution is needed in that we need to strive to become the "good" type of civilization we used to be.
If you're talking about an armed revolution to overthrow the government...no.
Read what frenchman Alexis de Toqueville said about America in the 19th century.
2007-01-27 07:49:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer think of Whites or Euros have lots of a difficulty with Latinos in keeping with say, fairly, unlawful immigration is the middle subject maximum of it is by skill of Latinos, unhappy yet actual. a greater advantageous question could be; "Why won't be able to Latino immigrants enter in the process the right channels and as quickly as right here assimilate into the yankee society and communicate English like each and every of the ecu immigrants over the final a number of generations!? by the way; this is extraordinarily uncertain Latinos will ever rule the rustic regardless of their numbers for obtrusive motives. Peace.
2016-09-28 01:47:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by intriago 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A revolution with what ends in mind? What is their platform? What are they rebelling against? In what way would they propose to make things better?
Rebellion for the sake of rebellion is the sad and hollow ideology of the hormonal whirlwind of puberty, not a solid political statement.
2007-01-27 07:48:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by joecool123_us 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Depends what the revolution stood for.
2007-01-27 07:58:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it meant that we'd become a free country and have a lot less regulation, and an actual capitalist economy (the ONLY fair economic system ever), no more subsidizing bad business and such, then absolutely!!!
2007-01-29 10:48:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eddie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's the revolution for?
2007-01-27 07:50:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by hobo 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The South shall rise again.
No I'd sit this one out.
2007-01-27 07:49:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sgt 524 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
depends on waht the revolutions was about.. not for something stupid tho
2007-01-27 07:46:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by road runner 4
·
1⤊
1⤋