2007-01-27 07:40:16 · 8 answers · asked by I 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
religious fanatics masquerading as pseudo-secular persons are the most dangerous.
2007-01-27 18:22:49 · answer #1 · answered by mcmohan40 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure, the religious fanatic is the "most" dangerous than Pseudosecular person. becaz religious fanatic destroy the peace in worldwide. every where in the global we face this problem.. its true.
2007-01-27 08:11:39 · answer #2 · answered by Sekar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt that you mean this, but secular humanists are not secular--they believe that Nature is supernatural. They are not humanists, either, because they believe that man is just another animal.
They are agents of those they pretend to be against. Both sides are aristocrats, who have no right to exist. If someone can't make it on his own and gets ahead only because of Daddy's money or connections, he doesn't belong in America.
2007-01-27 08:01:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both these types of people are equally bad. They are in these categories because they are irrational. Only a rational mind can think straight, which needs real values earned from proper education.
Gopal
2007-01-27 18:00:11 · answer #4 · answered by GOPALKRISHNAN N 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
religious is most dangerous
2007-01-28 17:15:55 · answer #5 · answered by mahesh r 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BOTH,i thing these two types are dangerous.
2007-01-27 07:51:36 · answer #6 · answered by ganesh n 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pseudosecular politics is for vote bank & pressurise hindus , psedoseculars are belives that if hindu is religious than he is communal , & if muslim is religious than that is his internal matter .
2007-01-29 23:23:31 · answer #7 · answered by prithvi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first one! obviously.
2007-01-27 08:20:18 · answer #8 · answered by pushp_0001 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋