English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-27 06:50:18 · 10 answers · asked by sally sue 6 in Politics & Government Government

10 answers

if your going to go that far with your ignorance, why dont you ask why we attacked afghanistan then?..bin laden was a saudi!


DUH!!

2007-01-27 06:57:52 · answer #1 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 2 1

We were not attacked by the Saudi's on 9-11. We were attacked by a group of people, of which some were Saudi born. This group is Al Qaeda. We declared a "War on Terror" - a war on Al Qaeda, groups affiliated with it, and countries who allowed these groups to form, train, and exist in their country. The main area for this group was in Afghanistan, which is why we attacked the training sites and known residences of the groups in this area. Following this, President Bush began focusing on Iraq, believing that Sadaam Hussein, Iraq's leader, had affiliations with Al Qaeda and had weapons of mass destruction with which to carry out his threats against us. That is what brought us to Iraq.

2007-01-27 07:18:59 · answer #2 · answered by Patty C 2 · 1 1

We were hit in part by Saudi nationals, not the Saudi government. Afghanistan was hit right after, Iraq was a different scenario.

2007-01-27 06:57:30 · answer #3 · answered by jeffpsd 4 · 2 1

They did and they didnt. Osama was born in saudia arabia and received much money from them, but this was mostly before he started his terrorist regime. If you are looking to point fingers, during the 1979 war between the USSR and Afghanistan, the united states supplied our boy in the middle east, Osama Bin Laden with many of the weapons, including RPGs, expertise in bombs, mortars, AK-47s that are being used against us today. Im still not sure to this day why we attacked iraq, but in hindsight i do believe it was a good decision, we just needed a much better plan, had everything gone correctly, we would all be praising bush's efforts as well as the job. Hindsight is 20/20, and his decision to go into iraq was half chanced, but so are the decisions that all of us make every day......

2007-01-27 07:11:43 · answer #4 · answered by mpolizei57 1 · 1 1

The 9/11 attacks were carried out by Al-Qaeda, not the Saudi Government. Saudi Al-Qaeda operatives were used because they have far less restrictions on their travel. Anyone who says that it's because members of our Government are in business with the Saudis needs a brain enema.

2007-01-27 07:23:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The Texxon Republic of America depends on the Saudis to gouge the world on oil prices, which the multinational oil slickers piggyback on, including British Petroleum (also known as BP, for Blair in our Pocket). Saddam was driving down prices by cheating on his quotas.

Obviously, the X-Mob at ExxonMobil hides most of its profits. If it only cleared 8%, it would have had bankrupting losses when its crude oil was only worth half as much under Clinton. Accounting is designer arithmetic.

2007-01-27 07:02:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

because Saudi Arabia is not a country it is Royal family.

2007-01-27 07:50:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because the Saudi Royal Family is in business with the Bush Royal Family.

2007-01-27 06:54:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

`Cause Terrorists Training Camps, were all over Iraq. Now, they're running for they're collective Lives. Next!

2007-01-27 06:58:49 · answer #9 · answered by Goggles 7 · 1 3

Go to this site, and it will give you the best answer, and the truth. The site is www.loosechange911.com. Watch the video and listen to it. It tells it all. Bush set this whole thing up. I hate him. He is killing our men and he doesn't even care. He keeps sending more troops just to die for something he started that could have been avoided!

2007-01-27 07:00:14 · answer #10 · answered by Manda 2 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers