well you cant count on tmac anymore he gets hurt alot and if i were to start a team, i think id take the healthier body. theres no point in taking damaged goods. JJ might not be as prolific a scorer as TMac or as fancy and flashy but he gets the job done.
2007-01-27 07:26:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by what? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What up Brian P, in the present day i might want to ought to bypass with a healthy Tracy McGrady. in case you had to %. between both gamers in the present day you would take Joe Johnson because he's youthful and he's starting up to emerge in his career- and Tracy is close to the end of his career (which has been plauged with injuries). At his maximum acceptable Tracy is a MVP type of participant. you actually couldn't do a honest evaluation till the end of Joe Johnson's career. he's turning out to be an familiar all-movie star. Nickster
2016-12-03 03:02:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Over the course of a season, Joe Johnson. T-Mac's back issues have been well documented. But T-Mac is no doubt the more talented player.
2007-01-27 07:36:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by skillzdatkillz383 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
easily tracy mcgrady, he is the much better all round player, with joe johnson being only good at specifics.
2007-01-27 06:48:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by v3rybored 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
mcgrady, hes more fun to watch, better at defense, and just a better player than joe johnson. plus i think tmac is younger, so hed have a longer career if i had him on my team.
2007-01-27 07:16:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I have to have them all year Joe Johnson. T Mac can't stay healthy.
Is it just me or does T Mac kind of look like Urkel. Well not as much as Josh Childress looks like urkel.
2007-01-27 06:48:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by alwaysmoose 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A healthy Tmac.
2007-01-27 06:47:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by prekinpdx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
TMac man
2007-01-27 06:48:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mike 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude cmon tmac for sure
2007-01-27 07:16:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by AlCas3ltzr 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course T-mac
2007-01-27 07:29:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by T-mac1_4life 2
·
0⤊
0⤋