G.W. Bush is doing incalculable damage to the U.S. We will pay for his arrogant, despicable decisions for decades to come. He needs to GO. NOW. Is there any constitutional way to impeach him before he destroys us all?
We are currently fighting a war for some reason or other in Iraq; we are sending more troops into Afghanistan, we have been involved in the last week in Somalia and we are threatening Iran.
Come on, folks...If we don't get rid of Bush and Cheney pretty soon, we're going to need a score card to follow the action. Why are we trying to police the world? We need to get over ourselves.
Then, there is the matter of money. I hear on the news that we are going to re-build Afghanistan. Not only that, but we're going to re-build Iraq. That's all very well and good, but when are
we going to re-build New Orleans? Not enough money, is there? Hmmm... Wonder why that is? I'm interested in hearing answers.
2007-01-27 06:39:40 · 12 answers · asked by warriorqueen 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
In order to be impeached, a President has to commit treason or a high crime. Bush has not done this, therefore he cannot be impeached.
Presidents make mistakes, the country survives. Don't worry Bush's term is almost up. The damage is already done. We just have to let it settle on its own.
2007-01-27 06:45:15 · answer #1 · answered by SaintsFan 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yea they can go ahead and start the process if they want to. But the congress isn't going to do that. There are lot on the table right now and impeachment isn't going to improve things much better with just 2 years left.
2007-01-27 06:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in accordance to the form, the President may well be impeached for "intense crimes or misdemeanors." besides the shown fact that, those phrases at the instant are not defined, meaning that that's as much as the domicile to confirm what constitutes an impeachable offense. The decrease decrease of an impeachable offense seems to have been set by utilising the impeachment of Clinton. He lied under oath approximately his relationship together with his relationship with an intern, which became no longer germane to his pastime with the aid of fact the President. rather, he probable lied for a noble reason, to stay away from tarnishing the workplace of the President and to stay away from embarassment for himself and a youthful woman. A case would desire to be made that any of a number of of Bush's extra arguable acts is a minimum of a misdemeanor reminiscent of Clinton's transgression. to illustrate, it might desire to be argued that Bush's mishandling of intelligence provided to him by utilising the CIA in the past he took us to conflict in Iraq became negligence turning out to be to the point of a intense crime with the aid of fact of its result. evaluate that negligence to the negligence of the Rhode Island band supervisor who set off off the fireworks without a enable (a misdemeanor), ensuing in one hundred deaths. Bush's negligence became lots better. the concern isn't in making a case against Bush. the concern is getting the Republicans interior the domicile to agree which you have made the case. they gained't with the aid of fact of their blindness to Bush's malfeasance. i prefer to propose the Rolling Stone article that argues that Bush is the worst president the U. S. has ever had.
2016-11-01 10:36:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"We are currently fighting a war for some reason or other in Iraq"
If you would wake up and stop bashing the US and Bush long enough to actually know why we are fighting in Iraq you might change your twisted point of view. Its hard times and hard decisions have to be made. Bush is doing the best he can in a bad situation.
2007-01-27 07:11:37 · answer #4 · answered by me 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes. Now that the Democrats have power in Congress, they have subpoena privilege. But they've already come out and said that they won't try to impeach. It's pointless now, his term is almost up.
2007-01-27 06:51:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Could you please provide something more than vague, Liberal approved, rhetoric?
I dont think you are asking a question as much as you are just babbling tired old and worn out political tripe.
EDIT: At the risk of being thumb downed even further, I'm sure your Liberal heroes are going to try for impeachment.....legal or not.
2007-01-27 07:12:09 · answer #6 · answered by dave b 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You guys that think like this make me sick!!!The economy is at an all time high,unemployment is at a record low,profits are up and the stock market is just booming.whats the problem?All you far left wing thinkers better wake up,cause taxes are gonna go up(compliments of the democrats) and watch unemployment go up as well.I do not want to live in a socialist state,like all you liberals do.So if thats what you want than move to France where jobs are hard to find and taxes are out of this world.
2007-01-27 06:50:58 · answer #7 · answered by Robert B 2 · 6⤊ 5⤋
if you can find a legenamit reason that you can back up with evidince, then it is possible to impeach him.
2007-01-27 06:45:32 · answer #8 · answered by Oliver 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
maybe Iraq war just for petrol..
2007-01-27 07:41:41 · answer #9 · answered by Seto!! 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't need to, everytime he opens his mouth he is impeachng himself...
2007-01-27 07:34:04 · answer #10 · answered by xyz 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋