English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Barry Larkin by far even though I love Griffey Jr. he put his numbers up in Seatle not Cincy, also no players have stayed long enough or been healthy enough to achieve anything.

2007-01-27 17:10:21 · answer #1 · answered by burrhead24 2 · 0 0

Since he wasn't mentioned along with Rose and Bench, I'd have to say Joe Morgan. He was the NL's MVP in 75 and 76. Anyway, since what you wanted was maybe players AFTER that 70's Red Machine, I'd have to go with Larkin. Griffey hasn't been all that good (or all that healthy)

2007-01-27 21:28:36 · answer #2 · answered by ljjahn 3 · 0 0

Barry Larkin

2007-01-27 14:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Barry Larkin.

2007-01-27 18:59:01 · answer #4 · answered by Play Ball 2 · 0 0

Barry Larkin.

2007-01-27 14:38:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Barry Larkin was a beacon of light in that dark tunnel for the Reds.

2007-01-28 02:06:17 · answer #6 · answered by Shazam 2 · 0 0

Barry Larkin was the bright spot for the Reds for years.

2007-01-27 18:19:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For his complete body of work as a Red I'd have to say Barry Larkin.

2007-01-27 17:18:34 · answer #8 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 0 0

Barry Larkin, and Ken Griffey Jr is a close second.

2007-01-27 15:16:25 · answer #9 · answered by bigdog1412000 4 · 0 0

Ken Griffey Jr. for sure. Definitely best all-around and in each individual category except for the injury factor.

2007-01-27 22:57:33 · answer #10 · answered by MJM 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers