Do you agree with this?
2007-01-27
05:09:12
·
7 answers
·
asked by
malcolmg
6
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Perhaps I better explain, it really is not about the night, as an analogy it means that if the sky were filled with stars it would be too bright to see anything. The stars shine out brighter against the dark. Therefore, any work of Art must have it's less inspiring moments in order for the best to stnd out against. Whether I'm retarded or not is open to question but as to the person who made that up, I think not. If you will excuse me I have some shiney sweet wrappers to stare at for an hour or two.
2007-01-27
05:38:24 ·
update #1
Meeowf, it's nice to see some Artists out there. I hope you can show people what this means sometime in your work. Maybe the night can't be all stars but thanks anyway for the star to this question.
Malcolm
2007-01-27
06:16:49 ·
update #2
fluppenhupp, don't you think the two could exist in the same work of Art? Be it a film, book or something else?
2007-01-27
06:19:13 ·
update #3
IMAGINATION, thats very true.
2007-01-27
07:26:12 ·
update #4