English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

England come in 1833 and put islanders in Malvinas Islands .They are from Scotland (majority) and are the principal reason because united naitions recognize the soberanight problem with Argentina.
Moreover England had done equal in countrys as Ireland fr example , where they bring inhabitants from his countrys to ocuppe ilegaly these territory.

2007-01-27 04:59:10 · 8 answers · asked by adam h 1 in Politics & Government Government

To esceptic:
Cansado de lidiar con la razon , baje de la montaña para ver el sol....
Supuse que ahi estaba esperandome , tan bello como siempre , como la primera vez que lo ame ...
Mas los clones traspasaron la muralla , mas sin darme cuenta tomaron la retaguardia del año en curso.
Ahora el centro del realismo se ha mezclado con el propio solipsismo.
Nada se sabe verdad o mentira en esta guerra de palabras .
La etica de la raza humana en el limite del mundo
...y un monton de argumentos huecos en este desierto furibundo...
¿caballos donde estais?
....mas alla de esta orquestada quebrada ..
donde el maldito se ha pergeñado en su transa maldita y compacta carcajada...
que suspiro tras suspiro , nada en su propio escepticismo
porque es lo unico que le ha generado su enfermizo optimismo ..
Como la verdad que habita en la fabrica de algun maldito cibernetico ...
Olvidando a aquel que en su defensa ha dejado su sangre con desvelo .

2007-01-28 13:55:19 · update #1

Dear Sir:
I dont see a superior nation in a country that cacht doesnt belong to them .
Moreover neither your press , nor government ,nor you , are the correct person to speak about corruption in my country when your country dont respect the law rule and answer whit hipocrecy as you to my question.

Regards sir.

2007-01-30 09:16:19 · update #2

8 answers

There are various bits of the world that are owned by the former colonial nations where there is contention. The Falklands (Malvinas) and Gibraltar are the two prime British ones, but what do Moroccans feel about the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Mellila, that nestle on the Moroccan littoral. How would America feel if we Britons had a naval base on Staten Island. What of Taiwan or the South Spratly Islands? All these are potential conflict zones.

I do feel that our Argentinian chap has a point. As a Briton, I might be a bit peeved if the Argentinians occupied the Isle of Wight.

Where sovereignty is at stake, the matter should be referred to the International Tribunal at The Hague. Argentina, having disposed of its corrupt Junta of Galtieri times, is a Nation worth cultivating, and it is silly that our relations should be prejudiced for the sake of 1500 ex-pats and about 2 million sheep

2007-01-27 05:29:29 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Foghorn I'm sorry, but I don't agree the matter of the Falklands. The Falklands issue was a time when Empires were still being built. You can't compare grabbing the Isle of Wight to the Falklands it was a different age and people thought differently Then. I'm sure if Argentina was a world power in those days it would have had an empire of it's own.
I don't know how to deal with the Falklands but as the resident appear to want to remain with Britain it's a problem that won't be solved that easily.

2007-01-27 06:18:46 · answer #2 · answered by Roaming free 5 · 0 0

Unfortunately, you can't go back nearly 200 years like that. In a perfect world, UK shouldn't have settled the Falklands / Malvinas and they should be Argentinian.

However, the wish of the current inhabitants of the islands should be the determining factor in sovereignty. As long as the inhabitants want the islands to remain British, they should remain British. If at any time, the population wishes to embrace Argentinian sovereignty, the UK should hand over the islands.

2007-01-27 05:09:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

whats your point? its part of the United Kingdom, ruled by her majesty Queen Elizabeth 2nd.

its part of the united kingdom, its inhabitants are part of the British Empire, with all the rights and protections of this great nation state.. why should we give it away to a mediocre bunch of footballing cheats... argentina showed us the hand of god..we showed them the sharp end of HMS Conqueror... and sunk the belgrano... the argies fires their missiles supplied the french collaborators... from safety over the horizon, and our lads marched 200 miles in full kit kicking ar se all the way...


argentina lacks the resolve to retake the falklands, it lacks the trained soldiers, the equipment and the ability to undertake the task... and weve got a garrison there, with a full sized military landing strip... and this is our history, it runs from the pages of history books. you have to remember our history is based on invasion subjugation and exploitation.. its what we do best.

you dont like it... get an army together, and well show you on the battlefield what it means to be on the other end of an SA80...

and anyway, arie soldiers ran away or surrendered without firing a shot.. very very few stood up to fight. and the issue of soverignty was only rasied by argentina... we already knew it was part of the empire... as was 5/8th of the world... if yu look waht we did in times past, id say argentina got off lightly... we should have marched into rio, shook ronnie biggs by the hand and raised the union jack...

2007-01-27 06:25:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Israel has been the only usa so a techniques that became constituted by skill of a UN determination over a land inhabited by skill of a different ethnicity . the declare for making one among those pass became that those people ( the jews ) lived there 2000 years earlier . the legitemacy of Israel stemmed from that deciosen , yet israel because of the fact that then didnt abide to any following selection made by skill of UN . all different decions like 242 and 338 have been meant to furnish greater legitmacy to the israeli existance by skill of making irae4l withdraw from right here and there and then have peace on the assumption of land for peace . that didnt ensue because of the fact the starvation for land crushed something . so now it is obvious that for israel to diffuse the arab - israeli conflict they should make too many stuff together as i think of that the time is basically too late now for any genuine suggestions . and what can the israelis do is basically to watch for conseqences of what they carried out in 60 years . i remeber while israel with its armies of attorneys and their western supporetes struck a peace cope with Yasser Arafat . all of us became satisfied that ultimately peace became reached , yet we did comprehend little or no . the next day Colonel Qaddafi threw out from lybia tens or 1000's of 1000's of Palastinians , saying to them : palastine is loose now , so bypass returned homestead . and for many weeks they suffered on the borders of Egypt . of course israel won't enable them to in , because of the fact the peace deal didnt say something approximately them and their case is meant to be reported interior the style called : the final stages , that's meant to come again years after peace . of course no one beleives that . and the arab - israeli conflict became under no circumstances solved . and it heavily isn't if the palastian refugees suffering became no longer placed to end earlier the different section . different than that it is barely an phantasm of peace . I basically wish no lots money and attempt is paid to sparkling up this difficulty if this refugees difficulty became no longer solved first because of the fact all different efforts would be in ineffective . and you're able to bear in mind what i say now .

2016-11-27 22:25:39 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you own a piece a land...you bring in who you want. The Argentinians can't take care their own country & population..housing, put to work, educate, provide health care, feed their own people, transportation, commerce, communications etc....Argentina is a corupt...bankrupt nation...where the population wants to moove and live in USA, or Canada, or UK, or Australia...where they will get a better life...than the one that their Corupt Goverment...is giving them. ARGENTINIANS...stop worry about the Malvinas...put yourself together and take care Argentina first...where the help is really needs to be apply.

2007-01-27 05:22:42 · answer #6 · answered by nikitasgarofallou 3 · 0 0

The people who live on the island will not accept Argentina rule
untill they will our troops are stuck out there also we lost a lot of men to keep them.

2007-01-30 00:26:18 · answer #7 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0 0

what an a**hole nameless is, you did"nt conquor the falkland islands the yanks gave it to you to stop you bitching about them kicking your a**e in the war of indpendence as for sinking the belgrano all it was cruise ship for children so get a life and go and join your mates in iraq or afganistan

2007-01-28 05:49:12 · answer #8 · answered by james m 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers