In a monarchy there is a royal family which is the head of all decisions and government usually based on appeasing the people or for the good of the country.
In a dictatorship there is a single person who, in most cases, took power, and doesn't usually consult or care about the everyday person in making decisions. They may try to appease a small portion of the country. Often times they have no one underneath them to advise them and can only be taken from power by force.
2007-01-27 04:50:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by bpbjess 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A monarchy is like a dictatorship in that the King or Queen have total power (unless you look at England where they have a watered down monarchy which is basically powerless). The big difference is that in a monarchy there is a clear succession to the throne and power whereas in a dictatorship the succession is not clear and a struggle for power usually follows the death of the dictator.
Chow!!
2007-01-27 05:10:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by No one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The difference between and absolute monarchy (the king or queen controls everything) is not much. A dictator is whoever rises to power, and a king or queen inherits the throne.
But there is something called a limited monarchy (king or queen consults something like a Senate or House of Representatives) which is different from a dictatorship.
2007-01-27 10:31:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by brooke 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Monarchy
1 : undivided rule or absolute sovereignty by a single person
2 : a nation or state having a monarchical government
3 : a government having a hereditary chief of state with life tenure and powers varying from nominal to absolute
Dictatorship
1 : the office of dictator
2 : autocratic rule, control, or leadership
3 a : a form of government in which absolute power is concentrated in a dictator or a small clique b : a government organization or group in which absolute power is so concentrated c : a despotic state
Key points here: Monarch inherits the throne through the family and Dictator just takes control of the country.
2007-01-27 05:28:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kristie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Monarchy: A system of government in which one person reigns, usually a king or queen. The authority, or crown, in a monarchy is generally inherited. The ruler, or monarch, is often only the head of state, not the head of government. Many monarchies, such as Britain and Denmark, are actually governed by parliaments.
Dictatorship: A form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution or laws or opposition etc.)
2007-01-27 04:54:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by geminimale82 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
A Monarchy is a country ruled by a King and/or Queen. Usually there is a hierarchy of nobility underneath that (like Earls, Dukes, etc.) A Dictatorship is a country ruled by one person. He makes all the laws and is usually a tyrant. That doesn't mean that a king/queen couldn't by tyrants. But they don't have to be. I suppose that a dictator wouldn't HAVE to be a tyrant, either, but I don't know of any that weren't. Think...Hitler was a dictator. Queen Elizabeth I was a monarch.
2007-01-27 04:50:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pooky 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
placed merely, a monarchy is very almost continuously hereditary, the throne passing from one technology to a unique, which contain tremendous Britain and the monarchies of Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, and so on. in the present day. In in the present day's international, they are very almost continuously with none authentic political ability and serve extra as a figurehead for a rustic. the prevailing Queen Elizabeth is a suitable party, and except some thing prevents it, she become be succeeded as monarch by technique of her eldests son, the Prince of Wales. at the same time as there have contained in the previous been monarchs who behaved like dictators, presently have lengthy on the grounds that exceeded. A dictatorship, on the different hand, is at the same time as political administration is concept by technique of one man or woman, often by technique of stress, and who controls the politics of his usa, in many cases without the enter of that usa's voters. Castro, operating example, will be categorised by technique of many as a dictator. Aristocracy only refers to individuals of the nobility in countries that proceed to comprehend such titles as dukes, duchesses, earls, counts, and different titles of nobility. The note is often utilized in places which contain the US at the same time as pertaining to a socially elite, and in many cases rich, caste gadget, yet this has fallen out of utilization in present day a lengthy time period. No usa has honestly been ruled by technique of aristocrats. What the founding fathers of the US had to make certain become that there might want to not in any respect be a monarchy contained in the States, nor a gadget at the same time as some human beings (which contain aristocrats) might want to be considered extra effective than others - in different words - all adult males were created equivalent and must have an equivalent say of their authorities. for sure, that is at the same time as slavery become nonetheless criminal and women human beings did no longer have the right to vote, yet that is yet another challenge altogether.
2016-12-03 02:56:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A monarchy, from the Greek μονος, "one," and αρχειν, "to rule', is a form of government that has a Monarch as Head of State. A distinguishing characteristic of most monarchies is that the Monarch usually reigns as Head of State for life; in a republic, the Head of State (often called the president) is normally elected for a certain amount of time. There are currently 29 monarchs reigning over 44 extant sovereign monarchies in the world, the monarch of the United Kingdom being shared with 15 other independent realms. As such, this one multiple monarch reigns over vast geographic areas including the trans-continental realms of Canada and Australia.
The term monarchy is also used to refer to the people (especially the dynasty, also known as 'royalty') and institutions that make up the royal or imperial establishment, or to the realm over which the monarch reigns.
In most monarchies, the Monarch serves as a symbol of continuity and statehood. Many monarchies are constituted by tradition or by codified law so that the Monarch has little real political power, in others the monarch holds substantial power but is limited from exercising it by popular or precedental opinion, but in others the Monarch holds substantial power. In some cases, the symbolism of monarchy alongside the symbolism of democracy can lead to divisions over seemingly contradictory principles of sovereignty.
Monarchies are one of the oldest forms of government, with echoes in the leadership of tribal chiefs. Many monarchies began with the Monarch as the local representative and temporary embodiment of the deity: (King of Babylon). The Monarch often ruled at the pleasure of the deity and was overthrown or sacrificed when it became apparent that supernatural sanction had been withdrawn: Celestial Emperor of China, Mayan kings, Achaemenid King of Kings of Persia. Other Monarchs derived their power by acclamation of the ruling or of the warrior caste of a clan or group of clans: Kings of the Franks, Roman emperors. Even where law is simply the monarch's will, the king must rule by custom.
Since 1800, many of the world's monarchies have ceased to have a monarch and become republics, or become parliamentary democracies. Democratic countries which retain monarchy by definition limit the Monarch's power, with most having become constitutional monarchies. In England, this process began with the Magna Carta of 1215, although it did not reach democratic proportions until after the Glorious Revolution in 1689. In the modern media age, however, popular Monarchs can, independently of their formal role within the constitutional framework, through popularity and various contacts, acquire considerable influence via public opinion and/or politicians.
Among the few states that retain a rather absolute monarchy are Swaziland, Brunei, Bhutan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. In Jordan and Morocco, the Monarch also retains considerable power. There are also recent (2003) developments in Liechtenstein, wherein the regnant prince was given the constitutional power to dismiss the government at will. Nepal had several swings between a constitutional role and direct rule related to the Maoist rebel movement and the palace killings by a suicidal crown prince
A dictatorship is an autocratic form of government in which the government is ruled by a dictator. It has two possible meanings:
Roman dictator was a political office of the Roman Republic. Roman dictators were allocated absolute power during times of emergency. Their power was neither arbitrary or unaccountable, however, being subject to law and requiring retrospective justification. There were no such dictatorships after the beginning of the 2nd century BC, and later dictators such as Sulla and the Roman Emperors exercised power much more personally and arbitrarily.
In contemporary usage, dictatorship refers to an autocratic form of absolute rule by leadership unrestricted by law, constitutions, or other social and political factors within the state.
2007-01-27 04:55:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by dhrew 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
a monarachy is when there is like a king that rules and the kingdom is always passed down to his sons and their sons and so forth and he got the kingdom from his father. a dictatorship is where there is one person who will come into total power by himself and he wont hand it to his sons and usually gets taken out of power or dies before he could hand it to his sons too. for example hitler was a dictatorship and king edward was part of a monarchy.
2007-01-27 05:12:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by 2kewl4skewl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Monarchy - King and Queen rule
Dictatorship- It doesn't have to be a King or Queen and they are usually tyrants
2007-01-27 04:47:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lizzie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋